For me, it seems like the fastest way of working, and based on what I normally shoot, I've never really had any issues and its served me well. I don't claim to be an exposure guru, so any advice (please no flame wars!) would be nice, and ultimately, good exposures and good focus are my primary concern as we all know that film is rather expensive, especially if you have to import it yourself!
Les Sarile - Rest assured, I aint no Steve McCurry... best description for my photography is "Seldom competent, often times worse" (a quote from the BBC).
I'd rather not use an external light meter. No idea if it would slow me down or not, but I don't think I would be comfortable having to use one before I take a picture.
If you are in Trinidad or Jamaica, you are a very brave photographer indeed.MattKing - I would prefer a camera that didn't look "modern". I don't want anyone to have to guess if its a recent camera and if its valuable. One look at it should instantly tell them "piece of junk" (although it isn't). Thank you for the generous offer though.
Sundowner - I'd rather not use an external light meter. No idea if it would slow me down or not, but I don't think I would be comfortable having to use one before I take a picture.
Les Sarile - Rest assured, I aint no Steve McCurry... best description for my photography is "Seldom competent, often times worse" (a quote from the BBC).
Good day,
Short story: I want a small film camera, with good wide angle lenses, built-in light meter available and must be easy to focus through the viewfinder.
Long story: I have a project that I'm working on this year that will require me to do some street shooting in a few poorer communities here, and I wanted to use a film camera primarily because I think I would be more comfortable using an old film camera than my digital slr camera (I normally don't shoot any public street scenes, mainly portrait sessions at private locations). I might be paranoid, but when I visit certain areas with my DSLR, I feel like I have a huge bullseye painted on my back as pretty much any digital slr screams "I have money, please rob me" (which I don't!).
I don't plan to stalk the streets, and will have the camera in plain view at all times, so its important that the camera meets the following requirements:
- Ability to take wide angle lens (24mm - 28mm). This was one of the reasons I decided against rangefinders, as using external viewfinders isn't appealing (plus they tend to be expensive).
- Is easy to focus!
- Has a built-in, usable and fairly accurate (in common situations) light meter.
- Fairly cheap used, with my budget being around 500 USD.
- Doesn't look too professional/modern, but is still functional.
Thanks for the help!
If you like the Bessa's then I would go for either a T with no viewfinder but it meters with lights on top or the R that does have the viewfinder and meter. Either of those with a Russian wide would be a good choice for being inconspicuous.
Here's an even cheaper Nikon option that will get you shooting some great pictures: the little-loved FG.
This is merely to point out that C41 film has so much latitude that you shouldn't worry about it.
Hey Laroy,Thanks for all the safety tips... I grew up in said communities, and I can fit in, and the only time that I've actually been robbed (several failed attempted robberies though) was when I went to Pakistan for a few months (by men armed with AK47s - Rather exciting ), and I was singled out because well, I certainly didn't fit in there.
Also, as I said, I'm just there to photograph how people make a living, so I plan to hang out with fishermen, market vendors, farmers, etc. I don't plan on interacting with any gang members or photograph any crime scenes or criminal activity. Also, the crux of my documentary will be interviews with victims of violent crimes, where I can easily control the environment. The only potentially dangerous part is getting those establishing shots to go with the narrative/interview.
Good tips though, and I do plan to get in touch with someone from a community before I go to shoot anything and I will certainly keep safety as my number one priority (and I'll just flat out avoid certain places).
I really wanted the Bessa R4M to work for me, but it just isn't as affordable. At around $1500 for lens and camera body, it might not be that much on its own, but considering I have to buy audio equipment to conduct interviews (you think photography is expensive? Not compared to video and audio equipment it isn't), so overall, wherever I can save some money, I'll take that route (eBay - FTW!). Granted, shooting film isn't that cheap either, but the cost adds up over time, usually not upfront, which I can manage. Maybe if I see a good deal or something, but given that they are current cameras and tend to be highly regarded, it is unlikely.
I thought the Jupiter 12 (35mm) was incompatible with the Bessas because of its protruding rear element.
That leaves a quite rare and *very* slow Soviet 28mm and the even rarer and very expensive 20mm...
The C/V 25mm is supposed to be quite good and also cheap.
I do plan on trying to go out to sea, but not in any rough weather, and I've done it before with my DSLR and it was fine, though not with flying fish
SO many choices with no clear consensus (people seem to prefer Nikon though) that I'll probably have to just resort to seeing what the best deals are on eBay (you can tell some of these sellers have no clue based on the spartan descriptions, so a big selling point for me is pictures and good description about shutter speeds, working meter, light seals, etc.). But, I am a lot more knowledgeable about 70s-80s SLRs than I was yesterday, very happy!
As for the metering, thanks for the help, and maybe I am being overly concerned but I guess that is what happens when you have lcd screens and histograms
My project may take more than a year to complete, so I'll be in it for the long run, and it has many aspects to it. I dont intend to win any awards, but it is just something I feel compelled to do.
The suggestion is good, so I'm going to second it: Nikon FG with 24/2.8. That's the combo that I've been running around town with for the last few weeks.
It's one of the nicest handling cameras I've ever had: smaller and lighter than any other SLR, BUT, and this is big, it has a handgrip bump on it that makes it very easy to handle. I had OM1s for ten years, and they do not handle well, all the other things that they are aside. I use an old-fashioned thin strap wrapped around my right wrist a couple of times and leave the camera hanging at my side by my fingertips. If you think chrome is more invisible than black, chrome will save you $10 off the ridiculously cheap $50 a good one costs.
The camera's dirt cheap, easy to replace if something happens to it, it takes a full line of easily available lenses, even a lot of current ones work. It has aperture priority auto, which I use, or manual and program, which I don't. There's not much to go wrong in the camera, and if it does, you throw it away and buy another.
I can't believe people have suggested things like F3+winder (and a wheelbarrow, perhaps?), or any old Canon--possibly the largest and heaviest 35mm film cameras ever made, with a now-obscure lens mount.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?