This may seem a daft question but is there as much detail in a paper negative compared to a film negative. What I'm trying to ask is that if you scan a 6x6 film neg (using a good scanner) you have a load of detail within the digital copy of that neg that will beat most digital cameras with high pixels, well so I'm led to believe. If that's true does that apply to paper negs if you wanted a load of pixels to play with once scanned. Or is it just down to the scanner or a mixture of both scanner and negative size.
Hope I'm making sense.
Hope I'm making sense.
Last edited: