My son-in-law told me to get my daughter, his wife, an Fujifilm Instax instant film camera. Which I did. They're around 40 years. So they are aware what's going on although they didn't ask for regular film camera.
I'm retired living in a 55+ community that has a photo club. Whenever I mention I shoot medium format film, all these old codgers of my age ask where do I get the film? They're all into digital and could care less about film. Let's face it. It's like asking people to start using vinyl records again. The people into these things are nerds like us. They know what's going on. The rest of the world has moved on and given up their saddles.
I think he did if you place the quote into its context:"it's like asking people to use vinyl records again"....have you heard the news?
Film users are a collection of nerds, hobbyists, hipsters and people who stuck with it despite of (or aggravated by) other technologies coming along. The vast majority of imagery is created digitally. Your vinyl-listening Ektar-shooting friend doesn't change that fact. The great resurgence (apparently) in film use doesn't change it, as it's still a micro-niche compared to digital technology. Most of the people you come across whom you think would dust off their old equipment - I'd say, put a roll of film into their hands and catch up with them 6 months down the line. I'd be surprised if even half of them have actually opened the package.Let's face it. It's like asking people to start using vinyl records again. The people into these things are nerds like us. They know what's going on. The rest of the world has moved on and given up their saddles.
They haven't. One of them has a Hassy, never uses it, but still wants to keep it.When the codgers tell you that they got rid of their film cameras, ask them if they got rid of all their old equipment.
View attachment 213005
When the codgers tell you that they got rid of their film cameras, ask them if they got rid of all their old equipment.
View attachment 213005
They haven't. One of them has a Hassy, never uses it, but still wants to keep it.
. Most of the people you come across whom you think would dust off their old equipment - I'd say, put a roll of film into their hands and catch up with them 6 months down the line. I'd be surprised if even half of them have actually opened the package.
If it helps, I can make a "YOU CAN STILL BUY FILM" t-shirt
How about one that says, "Film Cameras Recycled Here"...
If you are not going to project it, why shoot slide film? I don't think we are going back to the days of home slide shows. It's a niche within a niche.If Kodak had put 1/10th this level of commitment into advertizing the new Ektachrome, they would have reached hundreds of millions of people who weren't using film.
I don't think Kodak has the money to do what you want.While Kodak should be commended for giving us a new E-6 (after taking away three (?) versions), it is still fairly apparent that their heart really isn't in it.
Did you point out the spelling mistake to her?Last summer in Amsterdam when visiting the Lomo Store, I saw a pretty girl wearing a sweater with ''Film-friendly gentlemen prefered'' ...
I shoot and scan Velvia 50 slide film in medium format. I tried Ektar 100 negative color film. But I find negative film is harder to scan and get the colors right, especially when you don;t know if it's even exposed correctly which will effect the colors as well. With slide film, I can see immediately which pictures are exposed correctly before scanning them. Especially because I bracket. So it saves scanning and post processing time. I also like Velvia's color palette.If you are not going to project it, why shoot slide film? I don't think we are going back to the days of home slide shows. It's a niche within a niche.
Not her fault but mine ...Did you point out the spelling mistake to her?
I don't see any reason to shoot film and then scan it. Might as well shoot digital to begin with.I shoot and scan Velvia 50 slide film in medium format. I tried Ektar 100 negative color film. But I find negative film is harder to scan and get the colors right, especially when you don;t know if it's even exposed correctly which will effect the colors as well. With slide film, I can see immediately which pictures are exposed correctly before scanning them. Especially because I bracket. So it saves scanning and post processing time. I also like Velvia's color palette.
I also scanned all my old 35mm slides which I now show on my 75" HDTV. The film projector failed and I threw it out. I added background music to my scanned shots. I have title, credits, and add comments on the screen. The slide shows are easier to set up. They're on a memory card connected to the TV. I only have to select the show I want and press a button. SImple. They're more interesting, and frankly, I think they're better then projecting original slides. Plus, you can surprise friends with the show while visiting you. Press the TV button, and the show begins. In the old days, if I pulled out the slide projector, people would run screaming out the door to go home early complaining about sudden illnesses and headaches. You think they'd try to stay and watch my last vacation. I mean, they could have asked me for aspirin.
So, I kind of moved on. But not totally.
I don't see any reason to shoot film and then scan it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?