Ferrous Oxalate Developer

Approaching fall

D
Approaching fall

  • 3
  • 0
  • 145
Heads in a freezer

A
Heads in a freezer

  • 4
  • 0
  • 1K
Route 45 (Abandoned)

A
Route 45 (Abandoned)

  • 2
  • 0
  • 1K
Sonatas XII-48 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-48 (Life)

  • 2
  • 3
  • 2K
Waldsterben

D
Waldsterben

  • 3
  • 0
  • 2K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,694
Messages
2,795,358
Members
100,003
Latest member
cortessaavedra
Recent bookmarks
0

Rlibersky

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
930
Location
St Paul MN
Format
8x10 Format
In my quest for old and interesting developers that are known for not fogging I came across this one. Has anyone here seen or worked with this formula or one like it?.

My goal is to find a companion developer for the Chlorohydroquinone developer. This is a nice warm tone developer that has not fogged any of the old paper I have tried it on, some more then 70years old. It does have a nice warm tone without any extra toning. Now a colder or neutral tone developer with the same no fog quality would be nice.

I found this in “Photographic Facts and Formulas” Version 1975 AMPHOTO Page 116

Ferrous Oxalate (FeC2O4H2O)
25% Solution Ferrous Sulfate 1 part
25% Solution Potassium Oxalate 3 parts

Invented in 1879 a Dry Plate Developer. Replaced by organic developers because of the 4x exposure needed for film. Still used in scientific work that demand photometric measurements of great accuracy. This is due to the fact that this id practically the only developer that gives no trace of fog or stain.

Ferrous Sulfate oxidizes very rapidly to exposure to air. Mix at use. Sulfate must be added to the oxalate to dissolve fully.

It is the no trace of fog or stain that intrigues me. Has any one used an Oxalate as a paper developer? How about any formulas? If not, where do I start?

Thanks for any information.
 

Cor

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
211
Location
Leiden, The
Format
Multi Format
Hi, I cannot help you on below developer (I am sure that you know that these are toxic compounds, but Pt/Pd work with PotOx all the time, with proper working methods it should be ok).

I was curious by your mentioning of chlorohydroquinone as developer: what recipe did you use: Defender 58-D?

And what were the results?

thanks,

Best,

Cor

In my quest for old and interesting developers that are known for not fogging I came across this one. Has anyone here seen or worked with this formula or one like it?.

My goal is to find a companion developer for the Chlorohydroquinone developer. This is a nice warm tone developer that has not fogged any of the old paper I have tried it on, some more then 70years old. It does have a nice warm tone without any extra toning. Now a colder or neutral tone developer with the same no fog quality would be nice.

I found this in “Photographic Facts and Formulas” Version 1975 AMPHOTO Page 116

Ferrous Oxalate (FeC2O4H2O)
25% Solution Ferrous Sulfate 1 part
25% Solution Potassium Oxalate 3 parts

Invented in 1879 a Dry Plate Developer. Replaced by organic developers because of the 4x exposure needed for film. Still used in scientific work that demand photometric measurements of great accuracy. This is due to the fact that this id practically the only developer that gives no trace of fog or stain.

Ferrous Sulfate oxidizes very rapidly to exposure to air. Mix at use. Sulfate must be added to the oxalate to dissolve fully.

It is the no trace of fog or stain that intrigues me. Has any one used an Oxalate as a paper developer? How about any formulas? If not, where do I start?

Thanks for any information.
 
OP
OP
Rlibersky

Rlibersky

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
930
Location
St Paul MN
Format
8x10 Format
I have been using Defender 58-D for a while with good results on older paper that fogs with other paper, some that has been expired from as far back as the 30's. The results are quite warm even on neutral paper, with what appears to be very little contrast loss. (as compared to developers with an abundance of benzotriazole os Pot. BromideIt takes about 4 minutes for the image to develope but is worth it.
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,245
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
I posted a classic acidic ferrous sulfate developer once, I'll see if I can't find it and repost it.
 

gainer

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
3,699
Hurter and Driffield used 1 part of saturated solution of ferrous sulfate to 4 parts of saturated potassium oxalate. One part of this solution was often diluted with one part of water. They favored it for their experiments because of its complete lack of fog and its linearity. From the Hurter and Driffield Memorial Volume I quote "That ferrous oxalate does not, however used, attack silver bromide which has not been exposed to light is a most valuable and characteristic property of this developer."

A virtue of saturated solutions is that the ingredients need not be weighed.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom