An update:
Since these posts, Jim Patterson over at the altphotolist
pointed out that ferricyanide in the copper toner would also be reduced by thiosulfate in the image, producing ferrocyanide which then in presence of copper sulfate would form copper ferrocyanide as well. So there are two potential sources of extra copper ferrocyanide in the case when a copper toner is used, not just the one I described in Post #1. Luckily I was not completely wrong (whew!) - the first mechanism is also operative even when there is no thiosulfate present as in the case of
bromo-cuprotype where the bromide is the counterion to Cu(i).
There is a repercussion to this parallel reaction - which is depletion of thiosulfate from the image which is required for the next toning step with an acid. There, the acid dissociates thiosulfate into
sulfurous compounds which then convert a copper ferrocyanide to copper sulfide - as per the current understanding of why the image darkens significantly on acidic treatment. So if a good portion of thiosulfate was used up in boosting the copper ferrocyanide level in the step before, we should expect less of a dramatic change with acid. That is indeed the case - there is a boost in overall density but the tone does not change to near neutral as it is in the case when straight ferricyanide is used for toning. In spite of that, the overall Dmax is still much higher in the copper toned print. Here is the final comparison:
A = ORIGINAL CUPROUS/THIO IMAGE
B= STRAIGHT FERRICYANIDE TONING
B'= COPPER TONER
C=STRAIGHT FERRICYANIDE + 1% SULFONIC ACID
C'= COPPER TONER + 1% SULFONIC ACID
Full (COPPER TONER + 1% SULFONIC ACID) image:
The image still retains the reddish quality of copper ferrocyanide or Hatchett's brown.
:Niranjan.