The problem with this is that it generally worked the other way.
The military (or government, or some large industries) were willing to pay top dollar for huge quantities of very specialized, hard(er) to manufacture film. As those huge orders paid for making the stuff, it was economical to make just a bit more and sell it to the public.
In the interview with Film photography podcast, Dave Bias said they have all the old emulsion formulas and many from films never produced. That sounds awesome if they figure a way to make small batches of new (old formulas) without losing money.
The formulas they have are the ones that 3M, the former owner of Ferrania, created. I would guess it's extremely unlikely that they will get any Kodak Alaris formulas.That's beyond awesome! Hopefully they can get the formulas from Kodak/Fuji to do other things, like E200...I loved that film.
I read somewhere on their website that they have already found a fully working 127 film packing machine.
.
The only thing about packaging less common formats is that it will take away from production time of a common format. So it may be financially dubious to produce 127, 126, 130, 116, etc.
One of the founders is focused on the motion picture film. I wonder how they feel about the Kickstarter funders focusing so much on still photography.
That's beyond awesome! Hopefully they can get the formulas from Kodak/Fuji to do other things, like E200...I loved that film.
It would be probably easier for them to just come up with speciality films from scratch than to try to exactly match the look of a former Kodak or Fuji product, particularly when they don't have certified fresh stock to compare with.
Oh I'm not saying they should try to match it, I was thinking that at some point far down the line when they are hopefully very profitable and so on they can go to Kodak and say here's a suitcase of money can we have this and that formula please. Anyway, we can only hope
Of course at that point they wouldalready have an updated chrome 100, and Chrome 400, and the background on the differnce between the 100, 200 and 400 versions of the C-41 formulas. WIth that information is hand, why would they want to pay anything to a competitor, when they could design something in house.
With the Movie film background, they would be more likly to want to work on a 50 or a 25. Movie cameras normaly want to use a 1/50th shutter speed, (give or take) so for daylight use a 50ISO film would be very handy (or 64T). To be able to use the hundreds of Super 8 cameras out there that don't have agile light meters, a 40T would be a high value target. My super 8 camera is a resonaly high end SANKYO, and I don't think it can be made to do auto exposure with ISO 100 film.
Well you seem to know how it will all plan out so that's good.
I think their goals are way too optimistic. I really hope I'm wrong.
If I was calling the shots, I would be hoping for a 40T reversal film to keep as many Super 8 Cameras alive as posible....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?