Feeling a bad case of GAS coming on: square formats

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,526
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Gee thanks, Suzanne. Now I think I want one of those GF670s - rangefinder, meter, multi-format and all in a compact package that will travel well. All that's between me and that camera is the $1600 that I don't have!
 
OP
OP

SuzanneR

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
5,977
Location
Massachusetts
Format
Multi Format
Sorry Brian!! Funny, that $1600 is between me and that camera, too!! So, I decided I could part with $230 for an older version... won't be quite as easy to use, but I just put a roll through it, and it felt great!!
 

Attachments

  • Agfacamera.jpg
    123.3 KB · Views: 108

Klainmeister

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2010
Messages
1,504
Location
Santa Fe, NM
Format
Medium Format
What a lovely camera Suzanne! You'll be awfully surprised by the results from these little guys. I used folders because of my economic predicament (academia) before upgrading to a more modern system, but still use them time and time again because they are fun and produce stunning results for their age. Please post some results!
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,526
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
The challenge Iv'e had with the old folders (I've been using a Kodak Duo - 645 format) is that I am terrible at range estimation. I'm hoping to come across an accessory rangefinder one day that might help me out. I can easily deal with the red window - I hate fast film anyway.
 

Klainmeister

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2010
Messages
1,504
Location
Santa Fe, NM
Format
Medium Format

This is one benefit of being raised as a big game archery hunter

Have you looked for a Watameter or Telex? I've used both and they are pretty nice. Got em' for around $15 off the auction site.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,526
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
I'll have to use those search terms. Thanks for the suggestion. I've been looking at the Kodak Service Rangefinders mostly.
 
OP
OP

SuzanneR

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
5,977
Location
Massachusetts
Format
Multi Format
The one I bought came with the Watameter rangefinder attachment for the hotshoe, but it's in cm, and the lens of the camera is in inches. (Hurts my brain... not sure how useful I'll find it!)
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,466
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
Are you sure it's not meters and feet?
More or less 1 meter is 3 feet (39 inches, actually), so just multiply the number on the rangefinder by 3 and set the camera to that. Should be close enough if you aren't wide open.
 

PaulC

Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
26
Format
Medium Format
Try shooting a roll purely by guessing the distance. You'll probably be surprised and never bother with the rangefinder again.
 
OP
OP

SuzanneR

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
5,977
Location
Massachusetts
Format
Multi Format
bdial said:
Are you sure it's not meters and feet?
More or less 1 meter is 3 feet (39 inches, actually), so just multiply the number on the rangefinder by 3 and set the camera to that. Should be close enough if you aren't wide open.
Click to expand...

Barry, indeed, it's in cm to start, and becomes "meters" on the dial, and the lens is in feet, so I might be able to manage multiplying by three!

And Paul, I put a roll through it yesterday doing just exactly that. I figure F8 can help, if I'm really unsure, but I did some open to F4.5, too... won't have time to soup the film until this weekend...

I must say, I love the feel of it!! And I think I'll have to brush up on sunny 16... guessing the distance, the exposure... I don't always want to carry around a light meter.
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,925
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
Suzanne, I generally use the "sunny 11" rule as insurance. The only time I go for f/16 is on a blindingly bright day with a light colored background, seems to work out very well for me. It also helps to have a working knowledge of which items have an approximation of middle gray reflectance. Green grass is mostly perfect for this, a persons skin add one or two stops depending on how fair skinned they are. I assign the value to whatever my main subject is.
 
OP
OP

SuzanneR

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
5,977
Location
Massachusetts
Format
Multi Format
Just to follow up, I ran a test roll through the camera late last week, and processed it yesterday... really like the look of this lens. I'm too lazy to upload the pix here, but you can see them on my blog,

http://suzannerevy.blogspot.com/2011/09/test-roll.html

Thanks again for all the thoughts, can't wait to put some more film through it!
 

CGW

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
2,896
Format
Medium Format

Heavens! You scanned those? Surely the Analog Ayatollahs will have something to say about this! *^)

Like the William Klein "Gun 1" riff shot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,925
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
Nicely done Suzanne. One thing I've found, is to let the DOF help with focus. If you stick to mid-range f/stops you can cheat with focus and not need to be so critical. At least thats what I do. I know it's harder to do with medium format but once you practice a bit you'll start getting the gist of it.
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,477
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
PaulC said:
Try shooting a roll purely by guessing the distance. You'll probably be surprised and never bother with the rangefinder again.
Click to expand...

I'd disagree, personally, but maybe I'm just bad at estimating distances. I've found that at near-to-middle distances, an auxiliary rangefinder improves my results significantly as compared to scale focussing.

English<->metric conversions are pretty easy to get used to: 3 meters is almost exactly 10 feet and you can interpolate from there. The only real gotcha is the occasional camera that doesn't *say* whether it's in meters or feet!

-NT
 

DWThomas

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
4,605
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Format
Multi Format
ntenny said:
..... The only real gotcha is the occasional camera that doesn't *say* whether it's in meters or feet!

-NT
Click to expand...

Well in medium format, if the lowest number is 1 or 1.5, I think you can be pretty sure it's meters.

Most of my cameras have been SLR or had a built in rangefinder. As a mechanically inclined sort, I find I do pretty well at estimating distances. My one session of slight panic was doing some flash photography outdoors at a wedding where the wooded location resulted in near total darkness. No matter how good my estimates were, I had one heck of a time reading the numbers on the focus scale to set it! The problem never crossed my mind until I was faced with it. I was not an official photographer fortunately.
 

fatboy22

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
397
Location
Iowa City, I
Format
Multi Format
Suzanne,

This is a great camera, I own one. It is small and easy to carry with you, it is the fast and easy to load and amazingly quiet!
I highly recomend! They are a bit pricey but well worth it! I have had mine for 2 years now, no problems, very robust.

Jamie
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…