the test strip should be processed exactly the same asthe final print yo give any meaningful projection of the final outcome.I've been under developing my fb prints, and was reading in some old posts here how development times of 4-7 minutes could result in deeper blacks (or, could fog the paper if it's overdone). Is there some parallel universe in which I don't have to develop the test strips for that long as well? If I have 6 negs to print, and the test strip for each........it sure is going to make for a longer time in the darkroom compared to my RC days, what w/ the hypo soak, print washing, etc.
Is this a good reason to buy one of those automatic print exposure do dads?
I use a timer during developing both, strip and print, [Fomabrom FB in E-72 (+/- => D-72) 3 min. @ 22°C] and fix the strip for the full time (3min @ 22°C) only in the first fix bath.the test strip should be processed exactly the same asthe final print yo give any meaningful projection of the final outcome.
4-7 minutes ?I've been under developing my fb prints, and was reading in some old posts here how development times of 4-7 minutes could result in deeper blacks (or, could fog the paper if it's overdone).
The exposure meter can be quite useful if you use it to determine what your test strip times should be centered around.This has me considering buying an exposure meter to maybe speed things up, give me a baseline, or at least put me in the ballpark before making test strips.
That’s useful.The exposure meter can be quite useful if you use it to determine what your test strip times should be centered around.
As an example, if one negative prints well at 22 seconds, take a meter reading from a detailed highlight, then switch to the next negative, meter the detailed highlight in that negative and adjust your aperture until the meter reads the same as the first. Then you can do your test strip, centered around an exposure of 22 seconds.
It is a lot less work to have a standard negative (a "Shirley"), and to record the meter reading from a particular point, then make a table with the right print times for each paper/contrast setting for that negative and that meter reading and that point.If I were real organized I would record the settings for all the papers I use at the various enlarger head heights and filtrations.
Maybe you just don't like matte papers. I know I don't.... If I take a perfect neg I can make a print that looks very much as it should w/ RC or FB Gl papers, but when that same neg is printed w/ the fb matte it ain't working...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?