Favorite developer for tmax 400

peter k.

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
1,404
Location
Sedona Az.
Format
Multi Format
Getting into Tmax 400.. and have tried D-76 and Hc-110 on some 120 roll film. But as were going to order some Tmax 4x5 sheet film, was thinking of trying another developer with the new learning experience.
Were located in the bright sunny southwest so highlights on some shots can sometimes be quite extreme.
Thanks for any suggestions.
 

warden

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
2,960
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
For controlling those hot spots I like Xtol 1+1 with TMax400 with reduced development. (I'm assuming 4x5 will be no different from 120 which is what I use)
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,312
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Replenished X-Tol.
And a replenishment regime is perfect for sheet film!
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,720
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
peter k. said:
XTOL looks interesting,,, but has a short shelf life. AKA http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/xtol/
Whats the advantages of XTOL over D-76?
Click to expand...
It depends on what your definition is of a short shelf life by which I think you mean life once made into stock. I keep my 5L in winebags and have gotten 18 months from it. The alternative is decanting it into 250ml/300ml depending on tank size and filling to the top then using each bottle once for a 35mm film at stock or twice at 1+1 in reasonably quick succession or once with 120 film at 1+1 or as Matt has indicated using it as a replenisher

What makes you think of it as short life stuff? Is this something you read or have been told about by people and if the latter were able to ask questions of their storage etc.. As I understand it there was problem with the 1L packets many years ago and the 1L packets were discontinued. However the short life reputation may stem from this old problem

pentaxuser
 
OP
OP

peter k.

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
1,404
Location
Sedona Az.
Format
Multi Format
pentaxuser said:
What makes you think of it as short life stuff?
Click to expand...
On the http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/xtol/ website it states "In a full, tightly capped brown glass bottle, Xtol stock solution will keep for more than 8 months (confirmed by my experience). To get Xtol or any other developer to last, you must protect it from air."
Makes sense, common practice. But your stating you have gotten 18 months life out of the developer relives me. As from other references and sources it states it has a short shelf life, found out with its sudden death in developing. But doesn't say how old the developer was. They also suggest, one should develop at test strip before using it, as it does not show discolor as it ages. Makes sense and have no problem with that.
Having used only D-76 and Hc-110 before the question remains, what advantage does XTOl developer have over D-76? Softer contrast, or ?
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,609
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
it works very well in D76 1+1, exposed and developed at N-1.
 

Neal

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
2,016
Location
Chicago, West Suburbs
Format
Multi Format
First, my Xtol comments. I have used it as my main developer since 2000 and occasionally before and it has never failed me. If you are keeping developer so long that it is failing you are not shooting enough!

Now to be the contrarian, consider T-Max developer. It is a great mix as you go product with nice shadow detail. It has the advantage of lots of data at 75°F which might make it easier to use in AZ.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
sumatranol130 with a splash of ansco130 ( or caffenol C whatever print developer you have handy )
water bath ( pre wet ) and then shuffle for 9 mins or so, if you have one of those
plastic FR tanks, you can rock it on a pencil for about 1 min then let it sit / stand for 1/2 hour
then rock it again for a minute and bob's your uncle. also .. dektol or ansco 130 pre wet then 6-7 mins dilute
1:6 ( dektol @ 68, a130 @ 72ish) ( i just use them at ambient room temp ).
good old sprint film developer used as the bottle directs works wonders too.
sorry i gave you more than 1.
i stay away from tmax developer ( after caused me headaches of dicrotic fog ) and xtol ( caused me pathetically thin negatives )
 

warden

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
2,960
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
peter k. said:
XTOL looks interesting,,, but has a short shelf life. AKA http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/xtol/
Whats the advantages of XTOL over D-76?
Click to expand...

That web page and the information on it are quite dated. If you're shooting much at all you'll have no problems with Xtol. As for the advantages, here's a comparison from Kodak. Depending on your goals there may or may not be an advantage over D-76.

 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,312
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Neal said:
Now to be the contrarian, consider T-Max developer. It is a great mix as you go product with nice shadow detail. It has the advantage of lots of data at 75°F which might make it easier to use in AZ.
Click to expand...
As best as I can tell, T-Max RS has been discontinued.
T-Max RS is/was the version that was both suitable for replenishment and suitable for sheet film.
The other version - "plain" T-Max developer - is/was not recommended for sheet film due to problems with dichroic fog.
HOWEVER, lots of Kodak developers are going through changes, so this may need updating soon.
 
OP
OP

peter k.

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
1,404
Location
Sedona Az.
Format
Multi Format
Thanks all for the replies it really helped.. Going with XTOL and placing the order now..
 

KenS

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
941
Location
Lethbridge, S. Alberta ,
Format
Multi Format
GLS said:
Pyrocat-HD
Click to expand...

I will agree (whole-heartedly) since it is now the ONLY B/W film developer 'allowed.. and used' in my darkroom... for 'any' and ALL LF (ie 4x5 and 8x10") negative development in my home darkroom.. where hangers in tank (as well as tray development) have been 'cast aside' in favour (Canuckian spelling) of 'rotary development' in BTZS tubes.

Ken
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…