Favorite Camera for IR Film ?

DWThomas

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
4,607
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Format
Multi Format
Out of what I have, I enjoy using my Yashica Mat 124G. Using a TLR allows the opaque filter to stay on the taking lens while the composition and focus proceeds unfettered through the viewing lens (except for some ghosting from my filter kludge). I came up with a lot of plumbing to adapt an already owned 89B filter to Bay-1, but it works.

Some day it might be cool to get a 720nm filter in Bay-1 or adapt to a modest size threaded filter. The typically high cost of IR filters and my infrequent use of IR has held me in check.

My first IR outing used my Bronica SQ-A and I was fearing I would wear out the filter threads!
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
If HIE were still made then I would have some.
 

bsdunek

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
1,611
Location
Michigan
Format
Multi Format
I use my Mamiya Super 23 for 120 and my Yashica GSN for 35mm. Having the rangefinder eliminates having to remove the IR filter to compose & focus. A TLR would also be good as DWThomas says.
 

Alex Muir

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
407
Location
Glasgow, Scotland
Format
Medium Format
I use a Rolleicord Vb with the Rollei IR filter. Advantages as pointed out by DWThomas. I found a Bay 1 to 49mm converter on eBay which would allow use of an R72 in that size as an option to the Rollei filter. I use a Cokin P holder on my Bronicas with the Cokin 007 IR filter. For 35mm I use a Hoya R72 on a drilled out OpTech flip open lens cap. This works with 28mm and anything longer. It vignettes with 24mm. It is a 52mm thread which fits a lot of Nikon lenses.
Alex.
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,488
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
TLRs might have been invented for IR film. I was lucky enough to pick up a Rollei-Infrarot in Bay I, so I mostly use my 'cord for IR nowadays, but in the last analysis any good TLR is a good IR camera. Bay Whatever to 49mm adapters are common and usually don't obstruct the viewing lens.

-NT
 

Mackinaw

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
705
Location
One hour sou
Format
Multi Format
I have a few rolls of HIE left. I usually use a 89B filter (opaque to visible light) when I shoot this film so I always use a rangefinder, usually my Canonet QL-1.7 or a Canon 7.

Jim B.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,349
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Mamiya C330 with either a 65mm or 135mm lens.

I have a step-up ring that allows me to use the same 49mm 720nm filter with both lenses, a Paramender 3 head when I want to work close up, and both prism and waist-level finders.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,563
Format
35mm RF
I don't understand why you would have a favourite camera for IR film. Surely it makes no difference.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,563
Format
35mm RF
Please explain?

Well providing you have the focus setting adjustment for IR on the focus ring, I can't see why the camera would make a difference.
 

pdeeh

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,765
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
Let us assume that one does not have the skill to estimate exposure accurately by eye, nor own an exposure meter ... in which case, a rangefinder with through-the-lens metering (say, an M6 or one of the Bessa R*a or R*m) will make life much easier for composing and accurately exposing the film. An SLR fitted with an opaque or all but opaque filter however is is much less convenient, and any exposure data in the viewfinder (unless illuminated) will be all but invisible.

Shootingon on a tripod might be one riposte to my points, but of course not everyone likes or wishes to use a tripod.
 
OP
OP

klop

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
200
Location
Keyser, West Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Well providing you have the focus setting adjustment for IR on the focus ring, I can't see why the camera would make a difference.

I am sure that most photographer types like myself have or have more than one camera, and out of those, a favorite or two, for what ever the reasons may be, are and or have been preferred.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,349
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I don't understand why you would have a favourite camera for IR film. Surely it makes no difference.
The useful visible light blocking/IR transmitting filters are essentially opaque. If you put one on an SLR, you won't be able to see to compose or focus, so using such a camera forces you to constantly mount and un-mount an opaque filter.

Exposures with IR filters are typically long, so cameras well suited to low vibration use are good.

Some cameras have bellows that are IR transparent, so are therefore poor choices.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,563
Format
35mm RF
I am sure that most photographer types like myself have or have more than one camera, and out of those, a favorite or two, for what ever the reasons may be, are and or have been preferred.

Yes, I understand that, but why a camera preference when using IR film?
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,563
Format
35mm RF

Yes, but don't you use a tripod and compose before you put the filter on?
 

pdeeh

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,765
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
It's almost as if I didn't bother to post ...
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,349
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Well providing you have the focus setting adjustment for IR on the focus ring, I can't see why the camera would make a difference.
The "IR" focus setting adjustment on lenses is of little use with the currently available near-IR films, because the wavelengths of light that those films are sensitive to are so close to visible light.

It was different for Kodak HIE.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,563
Format
35mm RF

How does an exposure meter estimate for IR?
 

pdeeh

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,765
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
I think you're being deliberately obtuse clive.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,563
Format
35mm RF
Meter reading minus 4 stops in speed for me...

A standard light meter has no way of telling the IR light on the subject.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…