• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Favorite B&W Print Developer Formula

Snapshot

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
913
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
Multi Format
Hi All,

I've been experimenting with a few of the home brew print developer formulas. Specifically, the Kodak D-72, Silvergrain DS-14 and the Agfa 100 print developer formulas. They all seem comparable in terms of performance, although there are subtleties between them. So far, I seem to prefer the D-72 for its gradation and the Afga 100 for its luminosity.

Anyone have a favourite print developer formula?
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,794
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Ansco 130 of course! It's the only print developer I found that gave a slight edge in terms of the quality of gradations. Very subtle, you have to make a side by side comparison, but it's worth it for FB and RC. I also find that Kodak PolymaxT is very close as well.
 

Trevor Crone

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
546
Location
SE.London
Format
Multi Format
I loved Ansco 120 soft working developer which I used almost exclusively with Agfa's Record Rapid and Portriga Rapid papers.

Ansco 120
Water @ 52*C..................750ml
Metol..............................12.3g
Sodium sulphite, anhyd.......36g
Sodium carbonate, anhyd....30g
Potassium bromide..............1g
Water to 1 litre
Use diluted 1:2 or more for 1.5 to 3minutes.
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,688
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
I have used Dupont 54D for years:
2.7 grms Metol
40 grms sodium sulfite
10.6 grams Hydroq
87 grms sodium carb
.8 grms Bromide
Makes a liter and dilute it 1 - 2

For warm tone you can reduce the sodium carbonate by 2/3s and reduce the Hydroquinone by half and increase the bromide by 4 times.
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
130, BW-65, and Ethol LPD, in that order.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
All I use is Ansco 130. I have tried others of course, and quite like Agfa Neutol WA as well.
1. Very versatile in different dilutions
2. Brings out an amazing range of tones, almost as good as Amidol but cheaper
3. Lasts nearly forever if you can prevent it from evaporating
- Thomas
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
I would suggest checking and comparing them for tray life and capacity.

I have found quite a few developers don't have the capacity stated in the instrucions or data provided, and some have bad tray life.

What this means to me is that if I have to run 24 8x10s in a tray, the first one does not match the last, or if I am running a small batch and my wife calls me for lunch or dinner, the first does not match the last. I feel that quite a few of you are not aware of how fast some developers can change in the tray.

PE
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,599
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
Ron, if you're going to cast aspersions, at least name your target. WHICH developer(s) do not have keeping value? The most mentioned developer here in this thread is Ansco 130. So which developer is it that "quite a few of you" are missing the boat on? In my experience, Ansco 130 has VERY long keeping life, both in the bottle and in the tray.
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format

Ansco 130 has always been very consistent for me, and since I develop to completion, I can tell before it stops being consistent, because the developing times start to increase. If I were to continue past that point, it would be an issue. BW-65 is a one shot , mixed up it has a tray life of a few hours, and depletes fairly rapidly, but the results can compare favorably to 130, as long as one pays attention to the tray life. I use LPD when I'm out of developer, can't wait, and need to get some locally, or I'm just cranking out commercial work. I tend to use it one shot, although it is supposed to keep. It's decent stuff, but I don't use it for art, rather for "production images".
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
I'm sorry Scott, but having an interest in a commercial product would prevent me from commenting on any developer. I'm merely suggesting that you run your own tests to suit your own demands.

PE
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,794
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
I'm sorry Scott, but having an interest in a commercial product would prevent me from commenting on any developer. I'm merely suggesting that you run your own tests to suit your own demands.

PE

I can understand that you would not comment on a commercially branded product (e.g. PolymaxT, etc), but with respect to published formula like Ansco 130, I don't see the point of avoiding naming names, no?

OTOH, if you simply did not want people to pester you about longevity claims, then I fear you should not have raised the point at all.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Michel;

There is a third possible answer.

I cannot test every possible developer formulation out there, but I do know the pitfalls and needs inherent in many developers. Therefore I wanted to heighten awareness. Not raising the point would also be as irresposible as naming names.

PE
 

Richard Wasserman

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 17, 2004
Messages
726
Location
Wilmette,Ill
Format
Multi Format
I use a slight variation of 54D:

2.7 grams Metol
40 grams sodium sulfite
10.6 grams Hydroquinone
88 grms sodium carbonate
.4 grams potassium bromide
.3 grams Benzotriazole
to 1 liter water

Dilute 1:2 or 1:3 depending on paper

Richard Wasserman
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,688
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
Are you guys referring to the Adams verison of Ansco 130? I guess I will have to give it a try as I have a bottle of Glycin in the cupboard. the other day I accidentally omitted Hydroquinone from my standard mix leaving only Metol as a developing agent. I couldn't figure out what was wrong for the longest time. I had to process the prints for 3 minutes and I kept getting weak mottled blacks. then I saw my scale was still sitting at the metol measurement and I knew what I did wrong.
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format

Don't take their word for it, check it yourself. In that light, logical advice, especially since most published data must assume a median procedure.

Are you involved in the formulation of a new developer, Ron, or do you refer to your status with EK in the earlier post?
 

Bruce Osgood

Membership Council
Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
2,642
Location
Brooklyn, N.Y.
Format
Multi Format
Are you involved in the formulation of a new developer, Ron, or do you refer to your status with EK in the earlier post?

He just may be thinking about Liquidol that he and Bill Troop recently formulated for Photographers Formulary.
 

climbabout

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 11, 2005
Messages
225
Location
Fairfield Co
Format
8x10 Format
paper developer

As I use graded paper, I use Dr. Beers variable contrast developer exclusively. I figure, good enough for Ansel, then good enough for me.
Tim
 
OP
OP

Snapshot

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
913
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
Multi Format
It seems the Ansco 130 is very popular. How does glycin keep in powder form? It's my understanding that it does not have good keeping properties.
 

MurrayMinchin

Membership Council
Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
5,610
Location
North Coast BC Canada
Format
Hybrid
I was a total rookie mixing developers from scratch until Lynn Radeka's masking kit suggested making side by side comparisons of prints developed in Selectol Soft and Ansco 120. Then I just had to try Ansco 130 and before you know it I was experimenting like crazy. This is from the print developer section of the articles section;


Somebody mentioned quite a while ago that I could skip the benzotriazole and ramp back on the potassium bromide which would allow the Glycin to work subtle magic in the highlights. Once the darkroom is up and running I'm going to give that a try.

Murray
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format

I have worked out a developer with Bill Troop of A&T fame, and it is on sale by the Formulary (Liquidol). The Super Universal Fix is near final stages, and Bill and I are now working on a new High Acutance developer.

PE
 

Uncle Bill

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
1,395
Location
Oakville and
Format
Multi Format
I am partial to Dektol after messing around with Ilfords Multigrade Paper Developer. I made the switch after the solution kept losing strength in the tray.
 

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,421
Location
glens falls, ny USA
Format
Multi Format
It seems the Ansco 130 is very popular. How does glycin keep in powder form? It's my understanding that it does not have good keeping properties.

I've found that glycin does not keep well. Plus, it's such a fine powder and very easy to spill, I don't use it anymore. One sneeze and we're all dead!

However, I do like Ansco 130. It does last longer than other devs I've used, but not forever. I get a few days out of it before the print contrast gets wimpy.