Snapshot
Allowing Ads
I would suggest checking and comparing them for tray life and capacity.
I have found quite a few developers don't have the capacity stated in the instrucions or data provided, and some have bad tray life.
What this means to me is that if I have to run 24 8x10s in a tray, the first one does not match the last, or if I am running a small batch and my wife calls me for lunch or dinner, the first does not match the last. I feel that quite a few of you are not aware of how fast some developers can change in the tray.
PE
I'm sorry Scott, but having an interest in a commercial product would prevent me from commenting on any developer. I'm merely suggesting that you run your own tests to suit your own demands.
PE
Michel;
There is a third possible answer.
I cannot test every possible developer formulation out there, but I do know the pitfalls and needs inherent in many developers. Therefore I wanted to heighten awareness. Not raising the point would also be as irresposible as naming names.
PE
Are you involved in the formulation of a new developer, Ron, or do you refer to your status with EK in the earlier post?
MurrayMinchin said:I loved the look of Ansco 120 developer, and felt Ansco 130 had too much snap and sizzle for my images, but wanted the depth, richness, and keeping qualities of Glycin...so I came up with what I call;
12/15 Developer
750 ml...............................Hot-ish Water
12 grams............................Metol
36 grams............................Sodium Sulfite (anhydrous)
30 grams............................Sodium Carbonate (anhydrous)
45 ml.................................Potassium Bromide (10% solution)
15 grams............................Glycin
Water to make 1 litre of Stock Solution (S.S.)
Add 15 ml of 2% Benzotriazole per litre of S.S.
12/15 S.S. properly contained will easily last a year.
Dilute 1:3 for Working Solution (W.S.)
Use at 70 to 72 degrees F...warm Glycin is happy Glycin.
Because I keep 12/15 W.S. for up to several months in a mylar wine bag (depending how much it gets used) and because I want consistant print results over time, I use the Emergence Time (E.T.) of the image in the developer, multiplied by a Development Factor (D.F.) to find development times.
This developer has a slow image E.T. so I use the E.T. of the negatives clear edge multiplied by a D.F. of 4.5 for normal development. An E.T. of 40 seconds multiplied by a D.F. of 4.5 equals a developing time of 3 minutes. When the E.T. gets to about 48 seconds I toss it because developing times start getting too long for my tastes.
Applying a larger D.F. doesn't result in an overall darkening of the image, but has proportionally more effect on the darker print values...a quality which I believe is unique to Glycin.
This developer, at least with Ilford Multigrade IV FB glossy paper, and toned in selenium, gives a beautiful richness of tone and colour when viewed under tungsten light.
A word of warning - not much of anything happens in the first minute, a little in the second, but it really picks up speed in the third.
Don't take their word for it, check it yourself. In that light, logical advice, especially since most published data must assume a median procedure.
Are you involved in the formulation of a new developer, Ron, or do you refer to your status with EK in the earlier post?
It seems the Ansco 130 is very popular. How does glycin keep in powder form? It's my understanding that it does not have good keeping properties.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?