Well the nameplate wasn't what was confusing me.
The FTn is the only finder with the 2 front fingers to hold it so that requires a beveled nameplate.
Someone enlightened me on this aspect just the other night in a similar thread.
What I was confused on was if all the pre FTn finders required the cutout or just the Ftn finder.
My F matches Mirror Housing Type 4 on the page Bruce linked to.
How about the Nikkor 300mm f/2? I've posted a few shot I've take with it HERE
Jeesh, haven't you geezers all had a chance to answer this?
Does this thread offend you in some way?
Ken
What's the point?
Let us also not forget the fact that nearly all of the comments in this thread until the shitty one from CGW have actually related to the original post, and helped give the OP the information he needs to know. Hardly anything worthy of complaint here. And if you feel that there is, go complain to the moderators and let them decide. I am sure they will appreciate the tip off.
And I learned that '2F/2F' knows a LOT more about Nikons that I had realized.
Maybe I should be asking him all of my Nikon questions?
Ken
Totally understandable. I'm just saying as the OP I'd appreciate it if the thread could be kept on topic. I completely agree with your comment about how it would be a shame if APUG denigrated to the type of disrespect on other forums but I guess the way I look at it, allowing a disruptive post to derail an entire thread is kind of defeating. If someone posts a less the useful post, great. Let them, but don't allow it to disrupt the conversation and derail a thread as it has done in this case. Thats all I'm saying. To keep the thread on point and allow the disruptive thread to drift off into the past where it belongs seems a better route to me. After all I created this thread to be educational and to provide a document with valuable information for future readers. The detour that this has taken has occurred countless times before in countless other threads and nothing new has been said in response to the disruptive comment. Its simply an unnecessary distraction in my humble opinion. Either way, my question has been answered and I got the information I was looking for. Where this thread goes from here is up to the rest of you. Thanks to everyone for contributing valuable information and helping me out! It is very much appreciated!Can't speak for anyone else but I care.
It would be a drag (guess maybe I am a geezer) if apug denigrated to the type of disrespect you see on DPP or even FM.
Don't agree with the "who cares' attitude but respect your right to express it.
I'm somewhat surprised that Nikon never made a faster lens with Canon producing the f0.95 and Leica's f1 Noctilux (not to mention the current f0.95 version). Lets not let this spiral into a conversation about people's opinions of those lenses. There are some that love them and some that don't, nuff said. Are there any f-mount lenses made by other manufactures that exceed Nikon's f1.2 limit? I'm not talking about modifying lenses here, I mean lenses made by third party manufactures specifically for the Nikon f-mount.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?