For me, being able to change the time in f-stop intervals without calculating lets me adjust exposures, burning and dodging as I would judge in-camera. Thus, I can look at a print and see that I want it to be 1/2 stop lighter, etc. Plus, f-stop intervals are constant at any size enlargement.I must not know (Very Possible) what that means.
But i hear it discussed "all the time".....member XYZ is looking to buy an f/stop timer.
Isn't every timer an f/stop timer.?
3-6-12-24-48 seconds.?
Or simply watching a Clock/Timer and move the cardboard at each appropriate f/stop.?
Then just split the difference from there 24-48 =36 =31=27 or 28 or 27.5 if you are into that.?
Or does an f/stop timer just count 1-2-3-4-5-6.....and assign whatever time you want to each digit.?
1=3...2=6...3=12...etc etc
Does the f/stop timer just refine the process and make it more "versatile".?
Thank You
Right. Any timer COULD be, but the dedicated unit does it "better" and "easier".I guess thats the point of an f-stop timer. Dont have to crunch numbers, let the timer do that for you, all you have to concern yourself with is stops, half stops, etc.
you are right but a 'real' f/stop timer can be set to increase logarithmically rather than just using linear increases.I must not know (Very Possible) what that means.
But i hear it discussed "all the time".....member XYZ is looking to buy an f/stop timer.
Isn't every timer an f/stop timer.?
3-6-12-24-48 seconds.?
Or simply watching a Clock/Timer and move the cardboard at each appropriate f/stop.?
Then just split the difference from there 24-48 =36 =31=27 or 28 or 27.5 if you are into that.?
Or does an f/stop timer just count 1-2-3-4-5-6.....and assign whatever time you want to each digit.?
1=3...2=6...3=12...etc etc
Does the f/stop timer just refine the process and make it more "versatile".?
Thank You
Yeah, but I had found that with some practice when augmented by a good Porto, I could tweak how long I pronounced Mississippi essentially giving me f/stop control. Only after too many augmentations did i lose control of that process.... I remember getting my first real enlarger timer. Lot's better than counting 1 Mississippi, 2 Mississippi ,3 etc.
Yeah, but I had found that with some practice when augmented by a good Porto, I could tweak how long I pronounced Mississippi essentially giving me f/stop control. Only after too many augmentations did i lose control of that process.
if you eat a lot of carrots, you can improve your vision; drinking a lot of wine and you can double it; but drink a lot of vodka and you can see things that are not even there.so, why eat carrots?Yeah, but I had found that with some practice when augmented by a good Porto, I could tweak how long I pronounced Mississippi essentially giving me f/stop control. Only after too many augmentations did i lose control of that process.
any timer and the attached list can be an f/stop timerI must not know (Very Possible) what that means.
But i hear it discussed "all the time".....member XYZ is looking to buy an f/stop timer.
Isn't every timer an f/stop timer.?
3-6-12-24-48 seconds.?
Or simply watching a Clock/Timer and move the cardboard at each appropriate f/stop.?
Then just split the difference from there 24-48 =36 =31=27 or 28 or 27.5 if you are into that.?
Or does an f/stop timer just count 1-2-3-4-5-6.....and assign whatever time you want to each digit.?
1=3...2=6...3=12...etc etc
Does the f/stop timer just refine the process and make it more "versatile".?
Thank You
Appears to be so true, after too many Porto augmentations I started making images I never knew I actually shot.if you eat a lot of carrots, you can improve your vision; drinking a lot of wine and you can double it; but drink a lot of vodka and you can see things that are not even there.so, why eat carrots?
any timer and the attached list can be an f/stop timer
Very interesting and clever.....Thank YouIf you need something to help you conveniently remember a progression of half stops of exposure time, then this progression might seem familiar:
2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22, 32, 45, 64, 90, 128 ... (all in seconds).
If you need something to help you conveniently remember a progression of half stops of exposure time, then this progression might seem familiar:
2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22, 32, 45, 64, 90, 128 ... (all in seconds).
I usually start at 6 anywaysI don't know about the rest of you, but I have problems accurately counting 2.8 or 5.6 seconds... I basically do what Matt suggests, though, just rounding the numbers a bit:
3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 16, 22...
Actually, I don't like print exposure times much shorter than 15 seconds, so one could just start at 11:
Gosh!!! All these numbers bouncing around is giving me a headache!
Good luck to those that are able to do it 'manually' with a number chart on the wall.
I loved maths at school, but I am so glad to of gotten an RH f-stop timer to do it all for me. It is so easy compared to doing it 'manually' and it was definitely well worth the money paid!!!
Terry S
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?