[snip]
FWIW, the smallest change I can regularly detect in print exposure amounts to about 3%. Less than that and I'm not really sure. I'll let you f-stop guys figure out how much of a stop that is. (Someone will now certainly make a table with percentages to f-stop equivalents... I see it coming)
Best,
Doremus
10% intervals are insanely easy to calculate...
I still can't figure out why the U.S. has never embraced the metric system. That said, no one I know is better at adding fractions than an American carpenter...).
Some were kicked out, lol.Well, one reason is that America is populated by people who left Europe in disgust.
I understand housing in Europe uses 60cm as the base dimension for sheets of plywood and stud spacing. Even metric doesn't embrace metric ...
Oh, man - 10% is, lets see ln(1.1)/ln(2) = 137.5E-3 stops - I'd like to say I can do that in my head, but I can't. So if my time is 3.4 stops and I want to decrease it by 10% my new timer setting would be 3.4 - 0.137 = er, calculator please, I got it = 3.262 stops. Now what is convenient about that? (Insert smiley if you feel the need of one.)
The problem with percentages is that they don't add. A 50% increase twice over gets you a 125% exposure increase - not 100%. That doesn't make much difference if the adjustments are small - 2 x 10% = 21% - but if the changes are large - say changing print sizes or making part of an exposure adjustment with the aperture - things get a bit sticky.
Enlarging timers should have never ever been marked in seconds.
God did not create the integers - he created the logarithm. Silly little Man, who can only count on his fingers, created the integers. I mean, "And God Said 'Go forth and add'"??? And Hawking gets it wrong, yet again.
Bert, did you watch the tutorials on the RH site? Very helpful.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?