Extender / Teleconverter for Canon EF

Chiaro o scuro?

D
Chiaro o scuro?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 210
sdeeR

D
sdeeR

  • 3
  • 1
  • 246
Rouse St

A
Rouse St

  • 1
  • 0
  • 267
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 3
  • 4
  • 313

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,199
Messages
2,787,742
Members
99,835
Latest member
Onap
Recent bookmarks
1

ath

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
844
Location
Germany
Format
35mm
Hi,

for an upcoming vacation I'm pondering if I should add an extender to my EF 70-200/4L (non-IS).
What's your experience with original Canon and third party extenders?
Currently I'm thinking to add a Canon 1.4 converter to limit the quality loss.
How does the 1st version of this converter compare to the 2nd and 3rd?

Thanks for your time.
 

flatulent1

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
1,505
Location
Seattle USA
Format
Multi Format
I had the first version of the 1.4x and 2x when I still had the 70-200 f2.8 L IS. Image quality using the 1.4x was fine; using the 2x I noticed a dramatic reduction in sharpness. Ultimately I sold all three because I wasn't using them.

Over the years I've had a number of teleconverters (Canon FD and Minolta MD, as well as EOS) and rarely used them. I don't bother with them now.
 

Peltigera

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
902
Location
Lincoln, UK
Format
Multi Format
I have a Kenco 2x extender which I find to be excellent. I also rarely use it - not because of quality but because I just do not want particularly long lenses now. The Kenco works with just about all EF lenses, unlike Canon's version.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom