Extended Characteristic Curve for Delta 100

[Sal Santamaura]

Michael, if you have Delta 100 in XTOL 1+3 among those data at home, I'd really appreciate seeing the curve...

I do. I just need to go through the files. Do you need this urgently or can it wait until the weekend?

Are you looking for the curve for "normal" (by typical zone system standards) development as a baseline? Just want to make sure I post the relevant info.

The weekend is perfectly fine.

Yes, the "N" curve would be wonderful, especially if accompanied by information on the protocol (film size, developing equipment type, presoak / no presoak, agitation regime and temperature) used to achieve it. Thank you again!

 

[andrew.roos]

I've just got to go through the files to find that as those were the first tests. It is very similar to the DDX curve, but with slightly lower film speed (ie the curve moves a little to the right).

Thanks Michael, that's already very helpful. Thanks so much for all your reponses to my post.

Andrew

 

[Sal Santamaura]

…The "standard" developers I've tested the films in are…and XTOL…I don't have access to my film tests here at work, but at home I can post…

Michael, if you have Delta 100 in XTOL 1+3 among those data at home, I'd really appreciate seeing the curve…

I do. I just need to go through the files. Do you need this urgently or can it wait until the weekend?

Are you looking for the curve for "normal" (by typical zone system standards) development as a baseline? Just want to make sure I post the relevant info.

The weekend is perfectly fine.

Yes, the "N" curve would be wonderful, especially if accompanied by information on the protocol (film size, developing equipment type, presoak / no presoak, agitation regime and temperature) used to achieve it...

You must have had one of "those" weekends.

If you can post XTOL 1+3 information within the next couple of days, I'd be most grateful and in a better position to start some exposure/development tests planned for mid-week. If not, I'll just start with a best guess. Thank you in advance.

 

[Tim Gray]

Michael - thanks for sharing. I'd definitely love to see your curves for these films in XTOL (1:1, 1:3, whatever you got). No rush - just curiosity.

 

[K-G]

Thank you, Michael, for sharing all this information with us. When it comes to the last curves, comparing DD-X with XTOL, do you have any idea what the difference would have been with replenished stock solution of XTOL instead of the 1+1 dilution that was used ? I am a litle curious as I normally use XTOL replenished but sometimes DD-X for Ilford Delta films.

Karl-Gustaf

 

[Sal Santamaura]

You must have had one of "those" weekends...

...apologies for not having the chance to post the requested curves yet. I ended up being overwhelmed with work this weekend and completely forgot, and I'm working from out of town this week...

Yup, that's the kind of thing I envisioned. No need to apologize.

...These were 35mm tests.

If that means they were developed by inversion in small tanks, the data would probably not help too much with my sheets in a Jobo Expert drum on a CPP-2 anyway. I'll use a best guess time to start Delta 100 / XTOL 1+3 trials.

Your curves will still be interesting to see whenever it's convenient to post them. No rush and thanks again.

 

[Sal Santamaura]

...With XTOL at 1+3 and intermittent agitation, there is some compensating action as expected. With continous agitation in the Jobo this would be less pronounced.

Even at 1+3, I've never experienced much compensation with inversion agitation, but have always used more than Kodak's specified 100 ml XTOL stock solution per 80 square inches of film and agitated vigorously each minute. Perhaps with less developer stock and/or an agitation scheme approaching semi-stand there would be more exhaustion in the highlights.

 

[K-G]

Hi K-G: I don't use any replenished chemistry (use all my stuff one-shot) so I couldn't say specifically how replenished XTOL's macro curve compares to stock/1+1 or other dilutions without testing it myself.

Based on what is going on chemically in a replenished system, I would assume it to have slightly lower highlight contrast (in effect, a slight compensating characteristic which would allow you to develop the shadows a little further, resulting in a slight increase in effective EI). Some users report finer grain and higher sharpness versus unreplenished stock. I am sceptical and I think where image characteristics are concerned, the differences between replenished and fresh XTOL are likely very small.

Thank you again , Michael. I think I will stay with my dear old jar with replenished XTOL but perhaps use DD-X with more than only Ilford Delta films.

Karl-Gustaf