No, no.
The result may be the same. As far as the exposure is concerned.
But not as far as the camera, and dials that may or may not have been left in an undesired setting is concerned.
Unless you forget not to apply the 'compensation' manually when it is no longer needed (a difficult thing to do), you will never run into this problem when you use a camera in manual mode.
But in AE, there is always the chance.
AE lock sounds good, yes. If used as a one-shot compensation.
But it will not work when the thing you want properly exposed is lit below (or beyond) what your meter can deal with.
Then the only AE thing you can do is use that dial thingy.
But if you "compensated the exposure manually", how can you "never [have] used exposure compensation"?
(You're thinking about the latter as a feature of automatic cameras, and not as the thing it actually does.
That's quite o.k., since as a feature of automatic cameras, it leads to problems like forgetting you have it set. That's why automatic or not matters.
But see it as one and the same, i.e. look at what it does, and you'll see that you do not need the feature, and thus also not the opportunity to forget you have it set.
That's the point i was trying to make.)