You'd have to really fast with burning and dodging.Instead of an enlarger bulb, will paper respond when exposed using electronic flash, triggered remotely (by darkroom printer)?
Yes,as long as the light intensity is sufficient but, depending on the flash duration, you may have to deal with reciprocity issues because, some flash durations are too short.Instead of an enlarger bulb, will paper respond when exposed using electronic flash, triggered remotely (by darkroom printer)?
Just like with studio flash, this imaginary device may have a modeling lamp. But I see it all together it may be too difficult to work with such a device.Surely this could only have any chance of working for contact prints. How would you focus an enlarger if you had somehow replaced the lamp with a flash? I also not sure why you would want to do this.
This is a 6x6 cm negative enlarged on 8x10 lodima paper using a flash as light source.
The flash, a fairly small Metz 30 BCT4 flash (NG = 30), was arranged inside the light bulb space of a Durst M805 condenser enlarger. Obviously the light bulb was removed after the negative was focused and framed in the easel.
Because the lamp of the flash is smaller then light bulb, for a better light diffusion I arranged a square of Lee 250 (Half White Diffusion) beteween the electronic flash and the mirror inside the enlarger head, but despite this a lighter area in the lower left corner may be noted. The flash was triggered using an external switch; I do not remember how many times the flash was triggered for a correct exposure on this very slow paper, it was a two multiple, maybe 16 pulses. The iris was 4 or 5,6, I'm not sure, sorry but now I'm away from my notes.
View attachment 189650
It is printed on Lodima, which is a very slow contact paper. If you try to print using conventional light sources, the exposure times are loooong.Nice picture but what does this method achieve that is not achieved by using the enlarger in the conventional manner?
Lodima paper is so slow that it is impossible to use this paper with conventional enlarger: the exposure time should be so long and the heat from the lamp so high that the enlarger would be damaged.Nice picture but what does this method achieve that is not achieved by using the enlarger in the conventional manner?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?