So at iso 100 ? I'm new to photography btw lolI would rate it half stop slower and meter for the shadows. being an ASA 200 film, it has better chances for something nice than the 400 one.
So at iso 100 ?
Yeah I was gonna drop iso to 100 should I also add adjust my light meter for an extra stop since it's almost 20 years old?The rule of thumb that is often given for color negative films is -1 stop for 10 years past date. Meaning SpeedNow = BoxSpeed / (2^(YearsPastExpirationDate/10))
For 18 years, that gives about 57ASA. Round to 64 or 50. Faster films degrade faster than slower films, so if it were a 1000ASA box speed I’d use the lower rounding or even less (250 or 200 rather than 320 for the same 18 years of age), but for 200 the 64 should be a good start, with some bracketing around that number.
The rule of thumb that is often given for color negative films is -1 stop for 10 years past date. Meaning SpeedNow = BoxSpeed / (2^(YearsPastExpirationDate/10))
For 18 years, that gives about 57ASA. Round to 64 or 50. Faster films degrade faster than slower films, so if it were a 1000ASA box speed I’d use the lower rounding or even less (250 or 200 rather than 320 for the same 18 years of age), but for 200 the 64 should be a good start, with some bracketing around that number.
It’s a game of probability.Yeah I was gonna drop iso to 100 should I also add adjust my light meter for an extra stop since it's almost 20 years old?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?