EXG2, a highly compensating glycin-phenidone developer prototype

spain

A
spain

  • 1
  • 0
  • 58
Humming Around!

D
Humming Around!

  • 5
  • 1
  • 70
Pride

A
Pride

  • 2
  • 1
  • 141

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,425
Messages
2,774,785
Members
99,612
Latest member
Renato Donelli
Recent bookmarks
0

grainyvision

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
695
Location
Denver, Colorado
Format
Multi Format
So as much as I love EXG1, a glycin-only film developer that produces slightly raised contrast and rodinal-like grain.. One thing has irked me, it requires a second part to the developer. I decided to try to make an "EXG2" that uses phenidone and no part B instead. The exact formulation is still a prototype, so I'll just provide what I did as a working solution:

* 10ml glycin in (clear 99% grade) triethanolamine (TEA), 10% solution (ie, 10g in 100ml)
* 2ml of phenidone in propylene glycol, 1% solution
* 8ml of additional propylene glycol (used to thin out the final stock solution formulation)
* top to 500ml with water
* Final pH ~9.25, stable (after processing film pH remained the same)

The results are somewhat low density, that's the only reason I'm not done with the formulation. However, they were interesting enough that I wanted to share them. The films tested were Arista.EDU Ultra 100, otherwise known as Foma 100, and FP4+. I took some bracket shots ranging from 25 to 400 ISO on each film and developed it for 10m at 75F. To the bare eye, the ISO 100, 200, and 400 are nearly indistinguishable, but the ISO 50 and 25 become more obvious due to a bit more density. The density was of a brown tint with no base fog present, almost as if they were stained though I see no hard evidence of staining. If there was any staining though it would've been preserved. I used TF-4 fixer and a water stop bath. The results once scanned revealed rodinal like grain and sharpness, some very minor edge effects, and extremely compensated highlights, with the brackets shot at slower speed having a general smoothing of highlights with much lower contrast in highlight detail. Notice the difference in the texture of the snow between ISO 50 and ISO 400. Overall shadow detail was good even in the higher speed results, but the thin density would make it difficult to print. Will try using 50% more time in future tests, and maybe adding 1-2ml more phenidone 1%. The final stock solution formulation is intended to be the "last forever" type that contains no water. Results attached
 

Attachments

  • arista 100 @ 50.jpg
    arista 100 @ 50.jpg
    754.8 KB · Views: 122
  • arista 100 @ 100.jpg
    arista 100 @ 100.jpg
    808.7 KB · Views: 122
  • arista 100 @ 200.jpg
    arista 100 @ 200.jpg
    885 KB · Views: 99
  • arista 100 @ 400.jpg
    arista 100 @ 400.jpg
    927.7 KB · Views: 100
  • arista 100 @ 100 landscape.jpg
    arista 100 @ 100 landscape.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 119
  • fp4+ @ 50.jpg
    fp4+ @ 50.jpg
    789.9 KB · Views: 120
  • fp4 @ 100.jpg
    fp4 @ 100.jpg
    818.8 KB · Views: 118
  • fp4+ @ 200.jpg
    fp4+ @ 200.jpg
    893.1 KB · Views: 116
  • fp4+ @ 400.jpg
    fp4+ @ 400.jpg
    914.7 KB · Views: 96
  • fp4+ @ 100 landscape.jpg
    fp4+ @ 100 landscape.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 104
OP
OP
grainyvision

grainyvision

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
695
Location
Denver, Colorado
Format
Multi Format
Also for a look at what I mean by brown density, this is the raw DSLR scan at a 100% crop (mirrored) for the Arista 100@100 shot
 

Attachments

  • 2020-04-12 17_11_57-Photos.png
    2020-04-12 17_11_57-Photos.png
    901.6 KB · Views: 92
OP
OP
grainyvision

grainyvision

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
695
Location
Denver, Colorado
Format
Multi Format
Further experiments. With this I used 15ml of the 10% glycin-TEA and 5ml of 1% phenidone to 500ml of water and developed for 13 minutes at 71F. This worked a lot better but still not done yet. Results were of good but reduced contrast while keeping with the extreme highlight compensation. 13m seems to also be about box speed for FP4+. Also this exhibited quite a bit finer grain, especially in highlights and when over exposed. In fact, most of the same detail was there when comparing 125 ISO and 400 ISO, the difference in 400 ISO is mostly in a massive increase in grain level as well as overall increase of highlight contrast. I also shot some ultrafine ortho litho in the same tank, but that came out quite severely over developed and high contrast. I do have faith with a lot less development time though, that this would be suitable for taming the contrast of that film though.

Also, the biggest problem I had is that both FP4+ and ortho litho had some visible fogging. It didn't seem to affect results much, but would definitely make this an unsuitable developer for push processing.
 

Attachments

  • 2-fp4+@50.jpg
    2-fp4+@50.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 85
  • 2-fp4+@125.jpg
    2-fp4+@125.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 75
  • 2-fp4+@400.jpg
    2-fp4+@400.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 65
  • bonus cat.jpg
    bonus cat.jpg
    926.4 KB · Views: 71
  • 2020-04-19 19_09_22-_0000015.psd @ 100% (Levels 1, Layer Mask_16).png
    2020-04-19 19_09_22-_0000015.psd @ 100% (Levels 1, Layer Mask_16).png
    1.5 MB · Views: 82
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom