IIRC, all Exaktas (and many Exas) from the Varex to the IIb can share viewfinders. I actually thought that the VX500/1000 *did* use the same viewfinder mount, though I've never had one.
One of the things I don't like about the Exakta are the murky viewfinders, though there seems to be some variation between viewfinders and screens, maybe even sample- or condition variation.
Some prisims definitely seem brighter than others, perhaps due to better or more intact silvering. Also the screens can look quite different, apparently irrespective of type.
A split image screen exists, but most samples are bad - the splitting prisms often have glue/balsam problems.
The "prism" I actually end up using is the Harwix meter, while still somewhat dark and darker than a normal prism I recently got, it has a rather rough microprism spot which I find quite effective. I preferred it to the more common Travemat meter prism because of its better focusing ability.
At one point in the past I actually held a "focusing contest" between 2 meter prisms, 2 normal ones and 2 WLFs by repeatedly focusing on an object and marking the result on the focusing ring. The Harwix yielded the most consistent results, after the older WLF.
The best image of all is from the older (silver-coloured 4 piece fold down) WLF, which has a massive condenser and produces a big and bright image, despite the drawbacks of a WLF (verticals, anyone?).
The best you can do is to try cherry-picking, see which screens and prisms give the best view on your camera.
Anyway, I can only agree that the Exakta is probably the most beautiful camera out there.
P.S. I found the screen of a Praktina FX I once had to be quite good, much better than the Exakta's....
Sample variation? Subjective imprssion? Who knows...