- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Messages
- 13,928
- Format
- 8x10 Format
To me, it is evident that Atget was a "pictorialist", a word condemned by "The Group F64". This group was right about some photography but wrong about "pictoralism" not having a place in photography. Some of Atget's work shows this (to me, at least). I have begun to look at some of the "pictorial" photography done by the much maligned movement in the 1930s and later. Pictorial photography appealed to the "soul", not just to the mechanics of the medium. A few of the F64 types were able to capture this in their photography but most did not. Maybe it is time to return to shooting "pictorials" for some of our work. I think the medium, especially B&W would benefit. Now go look at the Atget pictures some more and others........Regards!I don't have the right words to say what I mean, but Atget often brilliantly used distant backgrounds to "place" the subject... it makes you see the existence of the subject more starkly when it stands out from the wider world behind it. Even when he didn't use distance, there was often implied "place": an open door (leading to somewhere else, to what is around the subject, showing that the subject exists within a world around it ) or the corner of a building that you can't see around, but still puts in mind that there is something around that corner. Somehow Atget's subjects stand out more because you can see they are somewhere. Not sure if that makes sense....
What a great discussion. I would like to offer a small tidbit. My friend the late Louie Stettner and I once had a conversation about the impossibility of working like Atget. Photography of the urban landscape and artifacts today merely become pictures of cars parked in every available spot on a street. Atget’s pictures are monuments to a lost world.
besides getting up early to beat the morning commute, my guess is he also did it to avoid harsh lightingthe trick to working like atget is to get up at like 4am and at dawn to photograph the area
Thanks for this insight, John. These days it appears that all one could do is to find some derelict place out in the sticks that is not fenced off or patrolled by security so as to get Atget style shots.i documented the city squares of somerville mass for a series of hand stitched books... the trick to working like atget is to get up at like 4am and at dawn to photograph the area
and know when rubbish day is. unfortunately the city ran out of $$ so i have 2 or 3 squares left to document which will just be in limbo .. i believed ploughed / cobble hill and sullivan square were
the last ones ... even paris in 1900 had busy streets at 7am ... he beat the morning rush, even when he photographed the homeless and les petits métiers de Paris...
these days haphazard parked cars, street furniture ( bolted down rubbish bins+recyclers. benches, parking meters, street lights, utility poles, crosswalk/streetlight switches, crosswalks &c )
become part of "now" so for a historic preservation standpoint ( what atget was doing it for ) it would be OK to have them in the view. HABS/HAER doesn't like them either (cars ) but sometimes they
can't be moved ... and its a collective "material culture"
Thanks for this insight, John. These days it appears that all one could do is to find some derelict place out in the sticks that is not fenced off or patrolled by security so as to get Atget style shots.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?