• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Eugene Atget Appreciation Society

His cataloging of street shots was his source of income. He odd style was deliberate - he knew what he
was doing. Even his camera and film were virtually obsolete relative to the era. Nothing naive there. Abbot might have helped invent certain myths about him being an old anchorite, but she never got into his head. I don't think anyone has, although certain of his compositonal strategies can be dissected.
 

This is how I 'read' Atget and his work. When I am photographing somewhere with a long historical record I inevitably think of what the place was witness to.
 
Without Abbott Atget would be unknown today. Atget has been the photographers photographer since Walker Evans promoted his work to those he mentored. It was the critical promotion by Szarkowski that brought the work to a wider audience.

What a long workman like effort to record a city in transition. He followed Charles Marville and others who were more careful workers. His obsession, production, quirky images plus his obscurity fuels the interest. He mostly approached photography on his terms which is part of his appeal.

I agree with the below quote and the posters comments. Atget's seems an enigma.

Eugene Atget ......is rather an example of a quiet genius producing a sublime body of work that could have very easily escaped the notice of the art-world.

The images I respond to are the unintended surreal accidents and the sense of transition.

I don't have a great city to photograph living in Oklahoma but I am mindful of Atget's techniques and let myself be influenced by his artless recording of place.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lartigue is another head scratcher and eye roller for me.

This is funny because I don't think Lartigue ever fancied himself as a "photographer" but as a hobbyist taking pictures of his family and unconciously his world. This is not to say that he didn't take some very good photographs. It also helped that he was friends with the Lumiere brothers who allowed him to use some of their new films.
 
Lartigue and Atget's are both French. One of the few things in common. Lartigue was aware he possessed a unique body of amateur work which sold before his death.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't have a great city to photograph living in Oklahoma but I am mindful of Atget's techniques and let myself be influenced by his artless recording of place.

Perhaps you are not looking at Oklahoma in the right way? It isn't Paris, but every city is unique in it's own way.
 
Without Abbott Atget would be unknown today.
he would have been known in the world of paris archives. seeing he did the commission for them. its like saying no one knows who jack boucher was or jet lowe is... you do if you are in their world.


"don't get Atget."
he was asked to photograph the city before it was razed for an urban renewal project,
he got up early so he had flat light, and wouldn't have people stumbling into his camera/tripod, he made exposures....
there really isn't much "to get"
 
Last edited:
I'm often astounded when I encounter those who "don't get Atget." To me, virtually all of his pictures contain a profound aesthetic sensibility that is unmatched. I consider him one of the five most important photographers of all time, and a magical bridge between the 19th and 20th Centuries. If God had been a photographer, his name would be Atget.
 
I feel that I "get Atget." The first time I saw one of his prints of street life I was sold. And had never heard of him before.
 

Couldn't agree more.
 
 
 
I would suggest that Atget is the Van Gogh of photography.


That's a great way to put it. My all-time favorite photographer. I think Ansel called him the world's first artist-photographer. I can easily agree with that. There's a profound sensibility at work in those pictures.
 
 
 


Clive.
 
"That's like saying that nobody would have heard of Jesus if it hadn't been for Mathew, Mark, Luke and John...."
That's an interesting observation... Fame requires an advertising and marketing agency, even God's.
 
If Stieglitz didn't like Atget's work, it's likely because he didn't discover it himself, and couldn't promote himself with it.
Me? Atget worked hard for many years and was lucky that the Surrealists found his pictures late in his life. Which brought Berenice Abbott into the picture, who saw the incredible pictorial qualities of his best work- which does stand out from the large amount of pure documentary work he did. That doc work has historical interest of its own- but the magic in Atet's best photographs is unparalleled and has been a source of enjoyment to many people, and an inspiration to ninety years of photographers since.