If you go to an art museum you see students trying to sketch an original painting or sculpture. They are studying the work. Trying to master a technique. They are not allowed to paint over the art. Only in Music can someone do a "Cover" of an original song or music and get paid for it. If you had your way, photography would be in the same position. I rather have my work, my own true version of what I saw and felt be the only one out there.
Yes, I would have it that way. What about taking the exact same photograph someone else has done? Same thing, in the end, seriously, you have to have your head compleatly in your ass to even give a damn.
This is the biggest problem with with art, everyone takes it far too seriously. This is the problem with most people, they take themselves far to seriously. Its pretty presumtious to even think that someone would want to even bother reprinting your negatives! At the very least, doing such a thing is proving how over swollen your ego is. In the worst case, your showing how much you loathe humanity, and wanting to deprive it of anything good, and doing everything in your own power to do so. No print will last forever, but if it is a good shot, someone will want a print of it. Now, this is what will happen, since they cannot have a new print made, they will scan the old one into a computer, and do a computer reproduction of it. you tell me which you think is worse!
So, while these people are going off to burn their negatives, they should build a funeral pyre for thier entire family to burn in! Its the same sort of thing, making sure nobody can ever benefit from something you did.
I'm will be leaving mine around, heh, and i hope some bum looks at them, thinks "man this guys sucks" and burns them in their fire place to stay warm. Would be a fitting end. haha
