paullgj
Allowing Ads
Complete agreement on all points, with the added observation that if you're looking at an exhibition of big prints, primes will be sharper and faster. The latter will be important in reducing camera shake as light levels fall; I take it that like all fiestas I've ever been to, this goes on well into the night.Too much gear, unless you have both bodies out and each mounted with a short or long zoom. That's still heavy.
Walk around with your full kit, as if you are already there, decide if it's really necessary. You're the one who will have to carry it, and if it gets in your way....
I'm still unconvinced that zooms are all that worthwhile. At least for me I find myself shooting almost exclusively at the long end of my tele zoom and the wide end of my 24-105. Might go back to primarily primes after all.
Leica still works: http://www.marcelataboada.com/
Glad I asked the question here. Prime lenses, hyperfocal distance, wide angles - that's really my kind of photography. Guess I'll dance with those who brung me. FE2, 24, 35, and 135 mm primes. That's what I feel comfortable with. The area, La Huasteca, is generally safe, on fiesta days photography is more tolerated than other days. Will be careful.
Also, be prepared to be robbed.... An easy mark. I had a belt-attached pouch that zipped shut and held my valuables.
Jerold,
This is an unfounded and careless statement. What makes one an easy mark is wearing all or your valuables in one little indiscreet pouch. You could easily suffer the same loss in Milwaukee by doing that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?