I'm looking for advice on how much better an Epson V700 scanner is over an Epson V600. The cost difference is about $400. I'll be scanning medium format film, 6 x 4.5 and 6 x 7 mostly.
Is the cost difference justified or can the V600 deliver the goods as well as the V700?
I have a V700, but since I can't compare it to anything else...so my opinion is rather moot. The V700 should be "better" than the V600 but I honestly don't know, I get good results with the V700 FFIW.
I have a V700, but since I can't compare it to anything else...so my opinion is rather moot. The V700 should be "better" than the V600 but I honestly don't know, I get good results with the V700 FFIW.
Thnaks for your comments, but I wanted to know what you want to do with the scans. If it's only for the web and small prints, the V600 will probably be sufficient. The V700 will do a little better job. But for real enlargements, you'd want to professionally scan with an otuside lab so getting a more expensive home scanner may be overkill.
Get the best scanner you can afford. The V700 TPU covers the full platen so you proof a full page of negatives; you can't do this on a V600 as the TPU covers only 2.7" x 9.5". 5x from medium format film using a V700 is very high quality as long as you use glass to keep the film flat.
Thnaks for your comments, but I wanted to know what you want to do with the scans. If it's only for the web and small prints, the V600 will probably be sufficient. The V700 will do a little better job. But for real enlargements, you'd want to professionally scan with an otuside lab so getting a more expensive home scanner may be overkill.
I will do everything possible with my negatives. I'll post them online and print them for hanging in my home. I want as much freedom to do what I want with my work.