Epson fluid mounting source

Takatoriyama

D
Takatoriyama

  • 4
  • 1
  • 60
Tree and reflection

H
Tree and reflection

  • 2
  • 0
  • 58
CK341

A
CK341

  • 3
  • 0
  • 68
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

A
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 3
  • 0
  • 95
Windfall 1.jpeg

A
Windfall 1.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 7
  • 0
  • 76

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,622
Messages
2,762,060
Members
99,423
Latest member
southbaybrian
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP
jtk

jtk

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
4,943
Location
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Format
35mm
AB149336.jpg
 

Stephen Prunier

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
372
Location
North Shore, MA,
Format
Multi Format
I have one for the V850, but I haven't used it yet. Although it's a lot slower method, It's supposed to give better results. I have some 35mm b&w negatives that I'd like to take my time with and get the best scan possible. I would like to print them on 13"x19" paper.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,283
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,629
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Could one of you please report back if you think it's worth the extra time, effort and mess of doing wet scans?

I can see doing it for abraded and scratched base negatives, but have my doubts about just as a means to improve scans overall.
 

Duceman

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
660
Location
Home
Format
Multi Format
Could one of you please report back if you think it's worth the extra time, effort and mess of doing wet scans?

I can see doing it for abraded and scratched base negatives, but have my doubts about just as a means to improve scans overall.

Eric at the Film Photography Channel does a comparison between dry and fluid mounted scans (comparison starts @ ~12:50 mark):



My experience has been that if you're having difficulty keeping the film flat, then fluid mounting solves this rather quickly. This is more of an issue with MF film, as opposed to 35mm film.

ETA: I've also found fluid mounting the only reliable method to use when scanning older films that don't fit in the supplied holders (e.g., 110 or 127 film when arching old family photos).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,283
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
OK I found the comparison video. It's from Nick Carver. He compares the Betterscanning fluid mount vs the Epson fluid mount as well as dry mounts on a V750. He found the Betterscanning wet mount the best. Interestingly, he found the V850 dry mount film holder the second-best, better than the Epson wet mount. Here; is his video.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom