Ilmarin said:Hello All!
Here is my situation: my wife, and I done some portrait work in the studio at the college, and now we are thinking about getting entry level light for home.
Recently, I came across this lot on eBay. Does anybody know if it's good for our purposes ?
firecracker said:The alternative is using flourescent lights (Kino) which is softer but takes far less power and doesn't heat up the room as much as the tungsten. You can even use the ones from DIY stores, and they are cheap.
The only disadvantage of using a flourescent lamp is that you can't use a dimmer. But the tungstern lamps, you can.
jason314159 said:Firecracker,
You can dim fluorescent lights but you need an electronic ballast.
regards,
Jason
Yes, actually I was using a pair of cheap clamp-on-lamps from wallmart for this shot.firecracker said:For "our purpose" picture, just use a 250W bulb and bounce it off a piece of foamcore. Or maybe flourescent lights with diffusion (opal) set near the person does the similar job.
One more thought: Chinese paper lantern with a small bulb could also work.
Follow Michael's advice about 600 WS minimum. I was shooting a rose this morning. The key light was a 300WS strobe into a large silvered umbrella, 1 1/2 stop for bellows extention and I was at F-6.3 for 100 ISO film. If your going to do portraits you WILL be using soft light and it will suck up a couple of stops. I recommend an 1800 WS strobe so that you will be able to use less than full power for durability. Just ain't no way to do it right on the cheap.blansky said:These lights aren't great for portrait work mainly because you will probably want to modify them (soften them etc) and in doing so you will cut their output considerably.
Personally I would purchase a monolight (strobe 600ws minimum) of some kind ( I use Photogenics) and there are relatively cheap ones out there. Buy a softbox and get a reflector of some sort for fill (fomecore works) and then build from there.
Michael
vet173 said:Follow Michael's advice about 600 WS minimum. I was shooting a rose this morning. The key light was a 300WS strobe into a large silvered umbrella, 1 1/2 stop for bellows extention and I was at F-6.3 for 100 ISO film. If your going to do portraits you WILL be using soft light and it will suck up a couple of stops. I recommend an 1800 WS strobe so that you will be able to use less than full power for durability. Just ain't no way to do it right on the cheap.
blansky said:These lights aren't great for portrait work mainly because you will probably want to modify them (soften them etc) and in doing so you will cut their output considerably.
Personally I would purchase a monolight (strobe 600ws minimum) of some kind ( I use Photogenics) and there are relatively cheap ones out there. Buy a softbox and get a reflector of some sort for fill (fomecore works) and then build from there.
Michael
Well, I prefer 6x6 B&W, but this could change.avandesande said:If he sticks with 35mm he wont need that powerful of a strobe.
avandesande said:If he sticks with 35mm he wont need that powerful of a strobe.
If my lights were at 1 meter I would have had about the same My strobes were at 2 meters for the amount of wrap around that I wanted. I use the white lightnings. The ones with the slider for adjusting output are well worth it. Beats moving the light back and forth to get the ratios you want.haris said:I get aperture f8 on 1 meter distance.
jason314159 said:Firecracker,
You can dim fluorescent lights but you need an electronic ballast.
regards,
Jason
vet173 said:If my lights were at 1 meter I would have had about the same My strobes were at 2 meters for the amount of wrap around that I wanted. I use the white lightnings. The ones with the slider for adjusting output are well worth it. Beats moving the light back and forth to get the ratios you want.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?