Enlarging pictures taken with ISO 3200 to 6400

Status
Not open for further replies.

igmolinav

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
80
Format
35mm
Taking pictures between ISO 3200 and 6400

Hi,

The new Leica M, can take pictures with an ISO as
high as 6400. On the other hand, Ilford manufactures
a film, Delta 3200, that can be pushed to ISO 6400.
This film, can be developed with Rodinal for a fine
grain development.

Many galleries, including the famous Leica Galleries
exhibit prints made with Leicas. My question would
be, which pictures would look less grainier, the ones
taken with film at ISO 6400, or the ones taken with
the digital Leica at same ISO? Lets say, that prints
are not larger than six feet or two meters in all their
dimensions. So, no larger than 20" x 24"

If the pictures taken with film are good enough, there
is no need for almost anyone to buy a digital camera
within the next three years. Would you agree or disagree
that film is still better than digital rangefinders with
24 Megapixels? That film looks less grainy?

Thank you in advance, kind regards,

igmotita : ) !!!

P.S. The negative can be printed directly with an enlarger, or
scanned with a good scanner. It is your choice. I just
want to see how good a film like Delta 3200 @ 6400
fares when enlarging prints!
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,553
Format
35mm RF
Wash your mouth out with soap and water.
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,473
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
We're on OT thin ice here. But, to address your question, in that comparison, no, film will not look less grainy.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
This film, can be developed with Rodinal for a fine
grain development.

Rodinal is NOT a fine grain developer and hence is not recommended for fast films particularly when they are pushed. That is unless you are looking for coarse grain.
 

Athiril

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
3,062
Location
Tokyo
Format
Medium Format
I've seen Delta 3200 @ 1600 in Perceptol looking relatively clean with a tight continuous grain structure.

You won't approach a high MTF% @ 80 lp/mm+ with such high speed film.

Rodinal is NOT a fine grain developer and hence is not recommended for fast films particularly when they are pushed. That is unless you are looking for coarse grain.

Semi-stand Rodinal is excellent for pushing, and gives good grain.
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
Film is a different animal than digital and Delta 3200 is a beautiful film.

It enlarges just fine, it has its own look which is IMO decidedly not digital.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
I can't figure out if this is trolling or cluelessness.

As others said, Rodinal is anything but fine grain. Maybe you can stand it or sit it or something (/snark) and make it work, but I like T-Max developer and I'm sure DD-X would do as well or better, for pushing these films. I love Delta 3200 but sadly have to admit that, for best quality by the usual measures, digital spanks film in very low light. It just does, at least the lowest noise most sensitive digital cameras.

But as Mark says the look is totally different. I've shot D3200 at 3200 but haven't tried 6400. Here's TMZ at 6400 though, printed on RA4 paper with the filtration adjusted to look like the torchlight it was shot under:


SCACOURT by Roger Cole, on Flickr
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
igmolinav:

i don't think you would have any problem enlarging any film to that size.
you can probably increase your iso even higher by hypering it in h2o2
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

it isn't hard to enlarge anything after it has been electrified,
i have some 8mm film stills for sale in a gallery and they are as big or bigger than you asked about ...
swiss lenses make a difference, not that cheap german glass
 

Alan W

Member
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
551
Location
Tennessee
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for the extra link John,now I've got another argument to follow!
 

tkamiya

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
4,284
Location
Central Flor
Format
Multi Format
Um.... I *want* grain in my photograph....
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
Film vs digital discussions are off topic for APUG.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…