Get a 6 element lens. I recently upgraded my darkroom to print 16x20. I bought a Schneider Comparon 80mm lens for MF as I assumed the name was good. My enlargements were soft at the edges. Only then did I read up on forums and learned that Schneider and Rodenstock both make cheap and good lenses. I bought a Nikon 75mm f5.6 for £56 and sold my Schneider for £5 after my own tests convinced me I needed a better lens. Stopping down helps a lot but this size of enlargements can make for some long exposures and so stopping down may not be the best answer. A better lens can be opened up more and remain sharp. I also took my enlarger bulb from 75 watts to 150 watts. This is great for stopping down large prints and keeping exposures to less than a minute. I do struggle though now with very short exposures at 8x10 even at f22 and some are as short as 4 to 8 seconds which really is too short. I have only been doing this for a couple of years but this is what I have learned.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
You really do need 2 lens, a 50mm for 35mm and a 90 for 6X7 or a 75 or 80 for 6X6. As you are planning on printing color a modern well coated lens is well worth the investment, an APO design is even better. Nikon, Fuji, Minolta all made very good 50mm 2.8 lens, then of course are the German. Bessler and Omega sold rebanded Germans lens which are very good. For keeping color chemistry at the proper temperature, some use hot water baths and keep adding hot or cold water to keep the chemistry at temp. If you look on ebay sometimes, an old Unicolor constraint temperature bath will show up. Not many were made, I have one I bought used years ago.
In terms of price, for black and white you can find Kodak Ektar and Wollensaks very inexpensive, both are 4 element and coated lens, I use a Wollensak 50mm F4 for black and white.
I've used several 50mm f/2.8 El-Nikkors over 40 years. All were good. Illumination isn't perfectly even wide open, but these lenses perform well at f/4 if the enlarger is properly aligned. By f/8, diffraction limiting becomes perceptible with ultra fine grain film.
Thanks for all the help everyone! So for under $100 on eBay, on just going to go with the Nikkor.
Hello,
Does anyone knows if I can enlarge a 6x4,5 negative with the Rogonar-S 105 mm f1:45? Our is better an 80mm lens?
Thank you,
Regards.
I never found much difference between brands.....In other words, I found that all name-brand, 6-element enlarging lenses are of high quality and very inexpensive nowadays.
EL Nikons are very good enlarging lenses and can easily compete with Schneider or Rodenstock.get a 50mm for 35mm and an 80mm for MF.wall mounting the enlarger is really worth it.To keep chemicals at temp, all you need is a cheap plastic tub and a fish tank heater;not a huge investment;back to the lenses;any 6-element name-brand lens will do.bad enlarging lenses are rare and good once are plentiful and cheap.So I'm fairly new to darkroom printing and so far have only done black and white at a facility in Toronto. I will start colour soon, once I find a good (and economical) way to keep the chemicals at a warm temp. Also, what I need to start any sort of printing at home is an enlarger lens. The only experience I have with lenses is the EL Nikkor 50mm 2.8. I don't really have anything else to compare with! Nor do I know how it reacts to colour prints.
What are your thoughts on 35mm neg enlarger lenses? I don't plan to spend too much money on it (many cheap options these days!), but if the results are much better, I will be glad to spend a few bucks more. If it's a question of 1-2 stops more to achieve almost indestinguishable results, I'll take my chances and save money (and loose a bit of time) and get a cheaper one. But if I need to go to f/11 to achieve what another lens does at f/4, then it might be worth the money and time.
I recently purchased a Rollei 6x7 CXL enlarger. Is there a focal length I can use for both MF and 35mm with my enlarger? That would be ideal... My biggest print sizes for now will be 11x14 but 95% of my work right now is 8x10. I might want to wall mount my enlarger to produce up to 16x20 one day, but that's probably far down the road.
80mm would be better. The 63mm probably won't cover a 6.45 negative, but I have never tried so can't say for sure.Hello,
Thanks for the awnsers.
Do you know if it is better a lenses 80 mm or a an 63 mm to enlarge an 6x4.5 cm?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?