Paul, just to clarify, the Konica T lost value because you engraved your SS, not because you blurred them outIt was common in the military, Vietnam, I have a chrome Nikon that has someones SS number. While in the Air Force I started with a Konica T, my first sergeant twisted my arm until I had it engraved. When I sold it I blurred out the numbers lost some value.
It's too bad that these were etched on the lenses -- assuming you want to sell them. My guess is that the small one is a 45mm f2.0, and the larger is the 100-200mm f5.6 zoom. If that's the case, they are not worth much anyway.
Here are all of Minolta's SLR lenses -- FYI:
http://www.subclub.org/minman/length.htm
I recently ended up with a selection of Minolta SRT gear. Every last piece has an SSN etched into it, even the flash. My Great-Uncle was a veteran and a machinist. Every tool I inherited from him with a large enough surface has his SSN on it.
It's endearing in a way, like remembering my Great grandmother and my grandmother watching us at Christmas making sure we carefully opened our gifts so that the wrapping paper could be re-used.
Signs of different times.
It's endearing in a way, like remembering my Great grandmother and my grandmother watching us at Christmas making sure we carefully opened our gifts so that the wrapping paper could be re-used.
Same situation here, even the flash has the number on it. I ended up messaging the woman who sold me the equipment, she stated it must've been her grandfather's because it was definitely not her father's SSN.
My understanding is that the social security number can tell you quite a bit, such as date of issue and perhaps approximate location. "006" might mean very early and in New England. Just a guess.
Thank you both, this scratches my itch of curiosity. Very interesting to think this was common practice!
Paul, just to clarify, the Konica T lost value because you engraved your SS, not because you blurred them out
The original owner of the lens might have started with a 101 or the like, then at some point upgraded to the XG-1 but kept the lens, a common practice as long as she/he did not want P or S preferred exposure automation. I use older lens on my X700.
Yes! The lot came with the the two lenses, an XG-1, flash, manuals, and a strap that smells like the 70's- I got a great deal at $30 for the lot.
Regarding the 50mm, I find it interesting (and have yet to find information on this) that this one has the "49mm" filter thread sizing information. I've seen photos of other variations of this lens, some of (what should be) this exact variation that do NOT have the filter thread information.
The XG-1 appeared in 1978, so that is contemporaneous to those lenses.
http://www.subclub.org/minman/xg1.htm
As to the writing on the Minolta lens face plates, it changed over time -- and sometimes even when the lens itself didn't change. Examples of this is adding the filter diameter to the face plate, or the location of MADE IN JAPAN.
http://www.subclub.org/minman/5014.htm
The 100-200mm had more variations that any other Minolta lens!!
http://www.subclub.org/minman/1005008.htm
Same situation here, even the flash has the number on it. I ended up messaging the woman who sold me the equipment, she stated it must've been her grandfather's because it was definitely not her father's SSN.
I think you're right, in some sort of way, this engraving feels special. It's like "John Doe was here", and now I have the privilege of using the same equipment as him. Or maybe I'm just hoping someone in the future feels the same about using my equipment.
I just hope analogue photography manages to hang on for a few more decades. As silly as that may sound.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?