- Joined
- Dec 10, 2009
- Messages
- 6,297
- Format
- Multi Format
When I did commercial work, I shot a lot of transparency film for publication. It's a real pain. Back in the day, I had to shoot tons of Polaroid to make sure the exposure was within the limited range of the film. Neg film has better latitude, but art directors prefer to see a positive for layouts. Printing from transparencies is tough too. Kodak's positive print material and Cibachrome was super contrasty. Some printers resorted to using masks to hold back the highlights. A good print was sure beautiful. I still think a well shot transparency on a light box still looks better than an image on an LCD-LED screen. Call me old.I have been thinking about slide film lately which is the type I have shot mostly with. I love the look of slide film on a lightbox but when it is printed or on a electronic form it doesn't quite look the same. Myself who takes an interest in it might spend some time with a lightbox and pour my eyeballs over it. In terms of the real world and when a lot more professional photographers used film, did they have end use other than making a print or putting it inside a publication? So I have thought about lately if this lightbox thing is a fun time hobby only and slide film and other film is really about making a print or printing it inside a publication or making a print on a brochure or billboard - in otherwords printing?
Thanks.
When I did commercial work, I shot a lot of transparency film for publication. It's a real pain. Back in the day, I had to shoot tons of Polaroid to make sure the exposure was within the limited range of the film. Balancing the color of transparency film was a pain and photographers used filters. Neg film has better latitude, but art directors prefer to see a positive for layouts. Printing from transparencies is tough too. Kodak's positive print material and Cibachrome was super contrasty. Some printers resorted to using masks to hold back the highlights. A good print was sure beautiful. I still think a well shot transparency on a light box still looks better than an image on an LCD-LED screen. Call me old.
Wow.I saw that as another form of projection, actally even a way nearer to looking at slides on a lightbox, than on a reflective screen.
I have projectors that incorporate a rear projection screen, but also yield the possibility to project on a big, reflective screen. I got the impression that such dual-use projectors were more a european thing.
Depends on the setup. If it’s casual background to conversation, like music, it can work. But notice how I write “tops”.
Problem is if there is a mini lecture attached to each and every slide.
That get’s old real fast.
Unless you are doing an actual lecture, it should be a very short show.
Twenty pictures at the most.
Or alternatively with a whole carrousel, something that is just there, while you converse and eat and drink.
Of course you should also enjoy you own photography.
It should never be a chore to take out the projector. Otherwise you might as well not have it.
Most home slideshows are boring to others. It's the same when someone shows you their photo album of their vacation to Outer Mongolia, or picture after picture of their new baby on a cell phone.. I once went to a lecture at my photo club given by an experienced semi-pro photographer. He was into flowers. For an hour, he went through about 100 slides explaining how he setup and shot each flower included the species and genus of each. By the time it was over, we were conspiring to execute the guy or break his projector.Alan... actually, I watched that video about 6 months ago. All the way through. I admit, I did a bit of fast-forwarding between images. I was looking up Key Largo for some reason (the place, not the song).
One way to conduct a slideshow that isn’t a snore fest, is to keep the tempo up.
Keep them wanting.
If you used a year compiling the carousel doesn’t mean it should take an hour taking a round trip.
If your projector has an auto change set it to thirty seconds per slide tops.
Then let it go and let people do what they want.
That’s actually a good way to hone your skills of taking attention and interesting grabbing photos. They should hopefully do the job of attracting an audience themselves.
Two projectors just seems like vast overkill.Good tips.
I'm using two projectors, normally with a hard cut or sometimes a very quick dissolve. I do around 4 seconds per slide with 10-20 slides tops, on auto with the presentation on a loop. That means the entire show is over in a minute or so, about the attention span of my friends and family used to scrolling screens. Photos of family and friends gain more attention than photos of mountains or flowers. I've found dissolving two slides of the same scene but with different focus points is a neat trick but it gets old quick.
Slide shows are mainly for the photographer.
Slide shows are mainly for the photographer. One thing nice about the digital slide shows plugged into your 4K TV, they're always ready to go. Just flip them on and show it. No setup of screens, projectors, stands, etc.
My Men's Club went to our fire department's training grounds for a tour. I didn't take my camera but had my Samsung Galaxy S7. So I took pictures and short videos and made a 3-minute video show for the CLub group when we all met. They showed it on the ceiling-mounted digital projector onto a large screen. It turned out pretty good considering it was all cellphone captured with no tripod. The S7 is about a 3 or 4-year-old phone. I added the song of course in the Premiere Elements editing program.Well my lot here doesn't like stuff in the lounge. Only exception is if they are having their passport photo taken!!
...
Kinda related to this. On YouTube Robin Wong compared a smartphone to his Micro Four Thirds camera and while the M43 was better. Non photographers would find no fault with the smartphone. The vast majority of them are not printing, they are not cropping or viewing it magnified, they are colorful and snappy.
Slide shows are mainly for the photographer. One thing nice about the digital slide shows plugged into your 4K TV, they're always ready to go. Just flip them on and show it. No setup of screens, projectors, stands, etc.
Slide shows aren't just for the photographer, they are also for other photographers!
If your slides are boring, then your slide show will be boring, unless the information they convey is supportive of other forms of presentation - think of an interesting talk about steam engines, illustrated by record shots.
But if your slides stand on their own as being compelling photographs, then there is no better way to share them.
What does that mean George? If the video is good and the images are also pretty good, who's comparing? No one watches two editions of the same video. They watch the one. If it's good, it's good. There's nothing to compare.I have never seen any truly useful visual comparisons on youtube as it impossible to present images in a full, unaltered state in a video.
The professor didn't have to ask his wife if she'd mind a permanently installed screen on the ceiling and projector all set up to go in the living room.That's just down to how dedicated you want to be about it...
A few of my professors in University still used slides, and it wasn't a fussy setup - Walk in, pull down the screen, index the slides to the first one, turn the projector on, and away they went.
Took the average student longer just to plug in their thumb drive and find their PowerPoint for presentations...
Nothing stops you from installing a nice screen and projector in your living room if you really wanted it. [And could easily double up with movie projectors too if you're keen.]
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?