And if you use XTOL replenished, no problem whatsoever!Yes. There are doohickies (technical term!) that you can insert into the 2800-series print drums (which can be used with the CPE) to allow you to load 5x7 and 8x10.
The aforementioned doohicky will allow you to load that. With XTOL 1:1, you could process it safely. 3 8x10 units requires 300mL of concentrate, diluted 1:1 makes 600mL, which maxes out the CPE capacity.
How many rolls of 135 or 120 film can a Jobo CPE-3 do in one cycle?
For example from our apug-Member and onlandscape-founder Tim Parkin (he is using the old CPE model without lift in this video, with the new CPE-3 with lift the workflow is even easier):
The fluid limits for Jobo tanks keep the pool level low enough that the chemistry won't run out if you keep the tank level and don't slosh it. The inversion lid is just a safety margin if you're doing horizontal rotary processing. Definitely not a bad idea but also not absolutely required.Hmm, shouldn't he be closing the film tank? It seems he's using the cogwheel top designed for other machines (ATL). I think he should use the "inversion top" and close it with the red lid. Otherwise chemistry might flow out into the water bath.
Does anyone know if Jobo are considering to remake an ATL type machine? I'm using a ATL-2 and it's a real time saver. Mix up the chemicals and pour them in (that takes the most time), press "Start" and do something else. The ATL will indicate process finish with a prolonged beep.
Yes. There are doohickies (technical term!) that you can insert into the 2800-series print drums (which can be used with the CPE) to allow you to load 5x7 and 8x10.
The aforementioned doohicky will allow you to load that. With XTOL 1:1, you could process it safely. 3 8x10 units requires 300mL of concentrate, diluted 1:1 makes 600mL, which maxes out the CPE capacity.
I’m going to toss in what is only my opinion and say likely not based on the following:
1. Not enough demand.
2. Much higher price point across the board as in MSRP & cost to build in terms of more parts, complexity of design & man hours.
3. Some incompatibility with the less expensive & more prolific CPE/CPP models?
Henning, thoughts?
Thanks for the insiights, Henning
regards,
chris
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?