Ektar or Portra this winter?

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
23,443
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Playing advocate of the devil a bit, but somewhat seriously: in that case, it doesn't matter all that much as you can make anything look like anything in digital post processing. As long as the film records useful information in all three color channels, you've got everything you need to get whatever look you'd like.
 
OP
OP

George Mann

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
2,868
Location
Denver
Format
35mm
I decided that I don't like the way warming filters affect the color balance of Portra, and probably Ektar as well as I find the latter too warm already.
 

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,551
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
George: Higher contrast and colors with Ektar for landscapes and scenics. Neutral Portra for people. I shoot more saturated Velvia 50 chromes and scan myself. But I;m shooting 6x7 medium format. Good luck and stay warm.
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,970
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
George Mann said:
OK, I decided to give a few developers a chance with processing and scanning my negatives.

So would you choose Ektar or Portra this winter?
Click to expand...
If I were you I'd shoot a roll of each.
 
OP
OP

George Mann

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
2,868
Location
Denver
Format
35mm
miha said:
If I were you I'd shoot a roll of each.
Click to expand...

My biggest dilemma is I have both a Nikkormat FT2, and an F90x. I figure that the Portra is going to perform better in the FT2 given its greater latitude.

The F90x is accurate down to a 3rd of a stop, which is better for the Ektar?
 
OP
OP

George Mann

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
2,868
Location
Denver
Format
35mm
Unfortunately, my sister has the car until 2PM today, so I will likely be out all night.
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,970
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
George Mann said:
My biggest dilemma is I have both a Nikkormat FT2, and an F90x. I figure that the Portra is going to perform better in the FT2 given its greater latitude.

The F90x is accurate down to a 3rd of a stop, which is better for the Ektar?
Click to expand...
No dilemma then.
 
OP
OP

George Mann

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
2,868
Location
Denver
Format
35mm
You are going to have to sell me on the Ektar given that I would have to go back to the store to purchase it.
 

WilmarcoImaging

Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Messages
639
Format
Multi Format
Night photography examples.

Months when images were recorded:
Image 1: September
Image 2: November
Image 3: December

Ektar 100 in 4x5:


Portra 400 in 120:


Portra 400 at EI800 in 135, one stop push in Flexicolor:
 

J 3

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2016
Messages
147
Format
Medium Format
Portura 120 and 400 are amazingly well behaved films. Ektar reacts somewhat like a slide film with an extra stop or two. It hates underexposure. My personal choice would be Portura 400, but shot at ISO 100. That's just because I've not photographed with it and would want to get an understanding of how it works. I took Ektar down to Zion one year and I really liked what it did to the rocks. The shadows in Ektar tend to color shift, when they are not blocked out. If you are digitally scanning, you can use Ektar for portraiture. You just have to dial down the contrast.
 
OP
OP

George Mann

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
2,868
Location
Denver
Format
35mm
I have compared both films on Flickr, and find that I prefer Portra. I am correct in assuming that I should avoid underexposing the 160 version?
 
OP
OP

George Mann

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
2,868
Location
Denver
Format
35mm
Well, I'm not getting out to shoot today, so it will have to wait for a more opportune time.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,778
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
True!
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,086
Format
8x10 Format
It's more important to pay attention to color temp issues with Ektar or an exaggerated blue shift is inevitable under certain circumstances. I always carry a pale pink or salmon skylight filter for minor correction, as well as an amber 81A (KR 1.5) for bluish overcast. Sometimes a stronger 81C is necessary for deep blue shadows under open blue winter or high altitude skies. These kinds of issues need to be addressed at the time of the shot; they can be very tricky or impossible to post-correct. So Ektar is fussier than Portra, but if you understand it, it will deliver more accurate hues in nature than Portra. It has quite a bit more contrast and saturation than P 160, but not as much as slide films. Fine-tuning contrast in the print is a different topic.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

George Mann

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
2,868
Location
Denver
Format
35mm
The last post reminds me of the weird hues and saturation I got when I shot Ektar, along with the pink-skinned people. As I have never used Portra outside of a studio setting, it will be a new experience for me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…