Ektar 25 was not known for good keeping, even refrigerated, and so your results will be a coin toss. It may be good or bad. The bad often showed up as extremely bad grain and a smeared look to the image as well as the problems associated with general bad keeping such as fog.
PE
Yes, the Royal Gold (and any replacement for Ektar 25) was better for keeping. The poor keeping was due to a chemical feature that was present in the Ektar 25 that gave good grain and sharpness.
It was not until Ektar 100 that they solved the problems associated with those of the Ektar 25. Of course, this is a gross oversimplification but it is true that follow on products were better.
PE
I'm sure glad Kodak produced Ektar 100 before all the 'bad things' happened.
We will probably never see such a film ever again. I feel lucky we got it.
I'll check and see - I know I have one roll, maybe two.
Roger, in that case you can send it to me, if push comes to shove I will develop it in black and white or such. Old film can be a lot of fun...
Oh oh! Me too! But I'll do it in color!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?