Ektar 100 In 120 Rolls

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
In one of my latest gallery postings, you can see the back of a 9"x18" camera in an RF101 that is unbuttoned.

It is the briefing on the runway photo, and the casette is in the background plane where you can look through the open sides.

PE
 

MikeSeb

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
1,104
Location
Denver, CO
Format
Medium Format
Ron, I've visited your gallery and left a few comments. As i said there, you had to have had the best job in the Air Force. Speed Graphic and all the Super XX you could shoot, and you get to fly around very fast, and sometimes even right-side up!

I especially love those gantry photos. I'd like to get hold of one of those cameras. Wonder if any of those old aerial or "launch" cameras are still out there somewhere, or have they been consigned to museums?
 

ssloansjca

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
120
Location
San Jose, CA
Format
35mm
I think the key question here is, with most of the wedding photography and portrait photography gone from medium format is there enough business left for manufacturers to be motivated to come out with new medium format films?

If so, is there enough of a market to profitably make Ektar 100 in 120?

Yes, I would buy it. But, will enough others?

~Steve
 

r-s

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
113
Location
People's Rep
Format
Multi Format

What, is this supposed to make me *stop* regretting having sold my Bessa II some 30 years ago?

I see no reason they couldn't have one standard/generic paper, and then stick a label on each end -- or, use a glorified automatic rubber stamp strike each end. The tail end is VERY important -- no lab is going to put unknown film in with the rest of their batch just because someone insists it's thus and such emulsion.
 

r-s

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
113
Location
People's Rep
Format
Multi Format

Normal 70mm cassetes aren't really that big/long length. However, there *are* some Hasselblads with 70mm backs that *do* take fairly long rolls. You can even get them for free. All you need to do is hop over to the Moon and pick them up.
 

Radioiron

Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2007
Messages
43
Format
Large Format
I thought they took the magazines and left the camera. It might be a little difficult to take apart a magazine and remove a cassette with bulky pressure gloves on.
 

fschifano

Member
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
3,196
Location
Valley Strea
Format
Multi Format
That's right. They took the magazine and left the camera. It would have been kind of dumb to have left the film behind. Even more dumb would be to have taken the camera back. Every little bit of weight mattered, and NASA wanted moon rocks.
 

nickandre

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
1,918
Location
Seattle WA
Format
Medium Format
That's right. They took the magazine and left the camera. It would have been kind of dumb to have left the film behind. Even more dumb would be to have taken the camera back. Every little bit of weight mattered, and NASA wanted moon rocks.

Next time we go back we should pick them up. I'd use one.
 
OP
OP

braxus

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
1,784
Location
Fraser Valley B.C. Canada
Format
Hybrid
As posted elsewhere and on Kodak's site here:

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/prof...tar/ektarIndex.jhtml?pq-path=13319/1230/13328

Kodak is finally listenning to us. Good. Without us they have no business to run.

Available in 120 starting this April. So if you want them to keep making this guys, keep buying this film. No one off production roll or expiring film in stores will keep this 120 film on their list.

I was one of many who called Kodak in support in making Ektar 100 in 120. Nice to see Kodak taking a shot at it. I hope it sells well.
 

FilmIs4Ever

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
377
Location
Cleveland, O
Normal 70mm cassetes aren't really that big/long length. However, there *are* some Hasselblads with 70mm backs that *do* take fairly long rolls. You can even get them for free. All you need to do is hop over to the Moon and pick them up.

Normal cassettes can store up to around 16 1/2 ft. (~198 in., ~502cm)
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
The 'regular' Hasselblad 70 mm backs take cassettes that hold approximately 4.7 meters.
They are called "70", not after the film, but in Hasselblad style after the approximate number of exposures a load yields.

There are also Hasselblad 70 mm backs that use spools, no cassettes, that hold more film: approximately 6 - 7 meters. They are called "100/200", indicating the number of exposures.

How much exactly depends on how thick the base of the film, and how tight you load the thingies. They are called "500" again the number of exposures.

And there were huge Hasselblad 70 mm back that took full 30 meters rolls.

You need not go to the moon for anyone of those. And they are not free, though with 70 film being rather scarce, you can get any of those for next to nothing.

(Besides: they left the cameras on the moon, not the film backs.
The backs used on lunar surface cameras are of the "100/200" type.)
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…