My future in shooting chromes (and to some extent negative film) in 35mm format will come down to being able to quickly scan film with acceptable quality.
Maybe something like the below will work well. Bulk scanning of 10 strips, 6 frames/strip. We have to wait and see if the scans are worthwhile when it comes out.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1434256-REG/pacific_image_power_film_scanner.html
But beware of friends - because the next what you'll soon find is that mark:
"No longer avaible" .
I would not be surprised if this is true (and I would be thrilled!), but do you have a source for this information?To the stand of information from yeasterday Kodak is planning to bring back Ektachrome 120 next year.
I'm quite sure this product listing you found on the B&H website is the old, discontinued E100G. You can find all kinds of discontinued products "listed" on B&H's website. They don't come up when navigating their site, but you can arrive at them via external links and google search. For example, here's one for a roll of Kodachrome 64:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/27956-USA/Kodak_1528306_KR_135_36_Kodachrome_64.html
I'm certain that this film is not planned to re-enter production, and the fact that the old product page exists doesn't suggest that it will.
I'm glad these discontinued product pages still exist, it's fun to read old reviews.
I would not be surprised if this is true (and I would be thrilled!), but do you have a source for this information?
I would not be surprised if this is true (and I would be thrilled!), but do you have a source for this information?
An anonymous friend of an anonymous internet poster said an anonymous Kodak official told him so. What more could you possibly need?
Quite right - I came to the same conclusions. Nevertheless I will not hope Fuji will proceed with discontinuation orgies like we saw during the last years.When the competitive products are being discontinued at an alarming rate, acceptance might be more readily gained.
In theory, it should attract more people given the format is more appealing. But Kodak faces an uphill struggle gaining acceptance of Ektachrome 100 in 35mm when it is priced much higher than competitive products.
Indeed Wayne : what more?
If you want to see first Kodak official statement - you have to wait till day x within next year (I guess you have to wait so long) but now you are best informed in advance still today......
with regards
PS : If you just remember this sentence : "They have serious thoughts to proceed with additional formats" and you would ask :"What could be the meaning and the conclusions from that ? We would just came to 4x5 inch !!!!
But THEN we would entry a speculative area.
Let's better talk about pricing. Fuji is discontinuing " prof." 5 packs of (all ?) their remaining E6!
What would you want to pay on 5Ektachrome120 packs (with nearly same designed package like on the photo from above) ?
Indeed Wayne : what more?
:"What could be the meaning and the conclusions from that ? We would just came to 4x5 inch !!!!
But THEN we would entry a speculative area.
Let's better talk about pricing. Fuji is discontinuing " prof." 5 packs of (all ?) their remaining E6!
I have high evidenciary standards. I'll wait for an announcement before making declarative statements.
I think "We would entry a speculative area" is a better title to this thread than "Ektachrome 120 will come back next year!"
PS : Sorry - but I can't find the problem here? Sure you want a source...but when PetaPixel will state the same you definitivly would ask again for the official anouncement ? Am I right or am I right ..
Nobody will ask you for a source if you avoid stating your opinions and speculation as fact.
I hope Ektachrome comes out in 120 because I'd like to try it. But just like you I have no idea when or if that will happen.
Perfect for the new PhotrioRumors site.An anonymous friend of an anonymous internet poster said an anonymous Kodak official told him so. What more could you possibly need?
But (sorry to tell again) it is a fact. Because of the source wich is more than reliable. But I can't tell you and indeed I don't want to tell more.
with regards
Oh ok, now I understand. You DO have a source after all. And it's a bonafide "more than reliable" special Trendland-only source. You just choose not to say who that source is. It's crystal clear now. Enjoy your thread.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?