Was the SB24 classified as "used"? If so, it's supposed to work. Just file a claim and don't accept less than full refund including original shipping.
Got the auction #? Let us see the exact description.
I think that the problem is this.
A lot of people, some of them that live on APUG, have bought cameras and other gear in the past from E-Bay. Instead of repairing things when they bought something that didn't work they put it back up on E-Bay and bought another...and another...and another, until they finally got one that worked. As enough people have been doing that over the last few years we are now reaching the point where all the cameras and other gear that actually worked has become very rare. The only things left are those items that people did not want to fix.
Of course, the only way to sell the items that didn't work was to describe them in glowing terms, post very selective photos that obscured the flaws, and then play dumb when the buyer found out the item didn't work. This is also why we now have such draconian return policies that are making sellers yell and holler.
Of course it could just be bad luck.
I respectfully disagree, Pioneer. I find it difficult to believe that, in most cases, gear passes through several hands without at least one seller being truthful about its condition. I've had decent luck overall buying from eBay sellers though there are times that I had to return something. This is largely due to being relatively careful regarding from whom I buy. If the seller 'obviously' lied then... wait for it... I file a claim... and get every dime back including shipping both ways. If it was an honest mistake and the seller is responsive and willing to accept a return then I don't file a claim and pay the return shipping out of my own pocket.
As is your right.
I was only making a speculative observation based on all the negative threads posted regarding E-Bay.
My own experience has generally been pretty favorable over the years.
But of course, what do I know? All of these negative reports must be coming from somewhere...right?
When I'm looking at an item on ebay, I automatically assume it is in poor condition until the photos and/or description convince me otherwise. If the description has more disclaimer than information, I pass. If the seller includes lamentations about ebay, paypal, and buyers, I skip over that one. If they're already hostile or defensive before the sale, its because they know they will have to fight you after the sale. I also do not hesitate to open a dispute if an item described as "excellent working condition" turns out to be junk. So I suppose the first rule applies again: assume the seller is junk until the description and feedback convince you otherwise.
The ebay system works pretty well. All of my disputes with sellers have been resolved to my satisfaction. As a seller, I am honest in my descriptions and have never had a dispute or negative feedback.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?