Easy to build open source shutter tester

Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 1
  • 0
  • 42
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 6
  • 1
  • 51
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 2
  • 0
  • 47
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 2
  • 0
  • 43
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 3
  • 2
  • 89

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,832
Messages
2,781,561
Members
99,720
Latest member
alexreltonb
Recent bookmarks
0

bjpirt

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2025
Messages
17
Location
UK
Format
35mm
Hi folks, thought you might be interested in this three point shutter tester I recently developed. It's very cheap to build and uses Bluetooth to communicate the measurements to a web page that can do nice things like show averages and how far off the shutter is from being accurate.

Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 09.03.07.jpg


It's all open hardware (and software) and the repository is here: https://github.com/bjpirt/shutter-tester

It uses the ESP32 as a microcontroller and so can make use of Bluetooth for communication. I've written a web app that uses Web Bluetooth built into Chrome to take the readings from the sensors and collate them all into a table so you can make averages and get a report of the calibration of all the speeds.

Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 09.04.09.jpg


You can check out how this works on this demo video I put together:

 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,883
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Welcome aboard @bjpirt and congratulations on this very interesting project! I like the elegance of the mechanical-electrical solution, requiring no additional housing etc. I hope you'll stick around on the forum to answer any questions that members will undoubtedly have.
 
OP
OP
bjpirt

bjpirt

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2025
Messages
17
Location
UK
Format
35mm
Welcome aboard @bjpirt and congratulations on this very interesting project! I like the elegance of the mechanical-electrical solution, requiring no additional housing etc. I hope you'll stick around on the forum to answer any questions that members will undoubtedly have.

Thanks - I've been a long time lurker on the forum so will definitely be sticking around. I'm a big believer in the open source approach to things like this and that only works if they're not abandon-ware so if anyone has any questions (or has lots of cameras and wants to test it out!) fire away!
 
OP
OP
bjpirt

bjpirt

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2025
Messages
17
Location
UK
Format
35mm
I've also got a few variants in mind based around the same software but with different hardware layouts
  • a reflective one that works from the front of the shutter and a thin mirror that will work with cameras without a removable back (e.g. early Barnack Leicas
  • a medium format version with different sensor positions for the different common negsative sizes (6x4.5, 6x6, 6x9)
 

Andreas Thaler

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Messages
4,863
Location
Vienna/Austria
Format
35mm
Great, I'm very interested in learning more!

I'll start with probably the simplest question 😌

How do you attach the sensor to the film window?
 

Andreas Thaler

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Messages
4,863
Location
Vienna/Austria
Format
35mm
How can the tester be made accessible to interested parties who do not want to or cannot assemble it themselves?

Is it possible to buy a finished device or have it assembled?
 

Andreas Thaler

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Messages
4,863
Location
Vienna/Austria
Format
35mm
I find it encouraging and impressive how new solutions are being developed for film photography

Who would have thought that when the digital scythe swept through the photography world at the beginning of the millennium and film was declared dead 👻
 
OP
OP
bjpirt

bjpirt

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2025
Messages
17
Location
UK
Format
35mm
How do you attach the sensor to the film window?
I actually just use a couple of small pieces of Blu-Tak - it sticks well and isn't too close to the shutter. However if that makes you nervous you could use an elastic band or some masking tape.

Is it possible to buy a finished device or have it assembled?
Not at the moment, but if there's enough interest I might make a small batch

Glad you like it!
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,883
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
What's it's accuracy and how have you verified it?

The sensors itself have a delay of 0.1-5us or so, depending on how they're implemented. Let's say single-digit delays.
The sensor readouts are interrupt-driven; typical inaccuracies in those ISRs (interrupt service routines) is in the order of the low-single microseconds.
Add to this the inaccuracy of a typical crystal that's used to time the ESP32 - this will be 40ppm or so, worst case.
So let's say this adds up to 10us, which is a particularly dark scenario. A 1/8000s shutter speed = 125us, so the timing on that one might be off by 8%, which is less than 1/3 of a stop. Again, that's very much a worst-case scenario.
 

paul ron

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
2,706
Location
NYC
Format
Medium Format
why does a shutter tester have to be bluetooth and involve web sites?

can this be used as a stand alone tester hooked directly to an off line computer using a program via usb?
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,883
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
can this be used as a stand alone tester hooked directly to an off line computer using a program via usb?

Apparently so given the documentation linked to in #1: https://github.com/bjpirt/shutter-tester
Open a serial terminal to the ESP32 (this is built in to the Arduino IDE). You'll need to connect at 921600 baud.

Fire the shutter and it will print out the timings to the serial console. There are two sets of timings:

  • The time taken for each shutter to travel across the frame - it's important to try and get both shutters moving at around the same speed
  • The time each sensor was exposed for in microseconds, milliseconds and fractions of a second
 
OP
OP
bjpirt

bjpirt

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2025
Messages
17
Location
UK
Format
35mm
What's it's accuracy and how have you verified it?

I've compared the timing against a Salae logic analyser and the Arduino was within a microsecond or so of that timing which I was pretty happy with. I haven't yet added compensation for the sensor width which will have more of an impact when measuring faster shutter speeds but I will be adding this shortly.

why does a shutter tester have to be bluetooth and involve web sites?
It doesn't, but that's the beauty of open source. I made this to scratch my itch and you're free to modify it as you see fit. For me, the web interface adds a lot of utility like being able to easily average up multiple readings and perform deeper analysis than you would be able to do with just a serial or screen output. Basically, I got sick of entering readings manually into a spreadsheet when calibrating a camera 😀 It also keeps the hardware required to an absolute minimum.

Incidentally, it's not actually sending data out to a web server, it all runs in the browser and can be run locally if you want.
 

paul ron

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
2,706
Location
NYC
Format
Medium Format
"uses Bluetooth to communicate the measurements to a web page that ....

I've written a web app that uses Web Bluetooth built into Chrome to take the readings from the sensors and collate them all into a table so you can make averages and get a report of the calibration of all the speeds."


so what does this mean in the op post?

"Incidentally, it's not actually sending data out to a web server, it all runs in the browser and can be run locally if ...."

ok so just plug it into a usb port and it will send data to my browser off line?

im sorry for my lack of knowledge for this technology.

ive used a calumat and an assortment of other stand alone shutter testers when i had my business. they never needed browsers n bluetooth or even a computer.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
bjpirt

bjpirt

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2025
Messages
17
Location
UK
Format
35mm
"uses Bluetooth to communicate the measurements to a web page that ...."


so what does this mean in the op post?

I think this is the difference between a web page that's executing in your browser and a web server that exists on the internet.

This uses Javascript that's all running client side to communicate directly with the shutter tester and so everything is running locally on your machine and so your computer could be offline and this would still work fine.

Edit: to be clear - it's not an internet connected shutter tester 😀
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,546
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Getting these things [focal plane shutter testers] to detect errors in shutters at 1/1000, 1/2000, 1/4000, and 1/8000 can be tricky. Little changes in the alighment of the sensors, the holes and the light source can have big effects.
 

monopix

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
156
Location
Lincolnshire, UK.
Format
Hybrid
The sensors itself have a delay of 0.1-5us or so, depending on how they're implemented. Let's say single-digit delays.
The sensor readouts are interrupt-driven; typical inaccuracies in those ISRs (interrupt service routines) is in the order of the low-single microseconds.
Add to this the inaccuracy of a typical crystal that's used to time the ESP32 - this will be 40ppm or so, worst case.
So let's say this adds up to 10us, which is a particularly dark scenario. A 1/8000s shutter speed = 125us, so the timing on that one might be off by 8%, which is less than 1/3 of a stop. Again, that's very much a worst-case scenario.

All of little relevance.

The accuracy will depend much more on how it detects the curtains, width of sensors, angle of light source etc. etc. and not on the component tolerances.
 

monopix

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
156
Location
Lincolnshire, UK.
Format
Hybrid
I've compared the timing against a Salae logic analyser and the Arduino was within a microsecond or so of that timing which I was pretty happy with. I haven't yet added compensation for the sensor width which will have more of an impact when measuring faster shutter speeds but I will be adding this shortly.
So you don't know how accurate (or inaccurate) it is when measuring real shutters then.
 
OP
OP
bjpirt

bjpirt

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2025
Messages
17
Location
UK
Format
35mm
So you don't know how accurate (or inaccurate) it is when measuring real shutters then.

I want to compare it against a known good tester - if anyone is able to help out with this I can send them one to play around with. If you have any suggestions on good ways of checking accuracy I'd be keen to hear them
 
Last edited:

Andreas Thaler

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Messages
4,863
Location
Vienna/Austria
Format
35mm
All of little relevance.

The accuracy will depend much more on how it detects the curtains, width of sensors, angle of light source etc. etc. and not on the component tolerances.

That sounds interesting, since you could save costs in series production by using the cheapest components with the largest tolerances.
 

Andreas Thaler

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Messages
4,863
Location
Vienna/Austria
Format
35mm
I want to compare it against a known good tester - if anyone is able to help out with this I can send them one to play around with. If you have any suggestions on good ways of checking accuracy I'd be keen to hear them

Minolta, for example, specified a tolerance of 0.5 EV for the exposure metering system of its 7000 AF. This is completely sufficient for practical work.

And from what I understand from your explanations, this is true.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,883
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
All of little relevance.

The accuracy will depend much more on how it detects the curtains, width of sensors, angle of light source etc. etc. and not on the component tolerances.

So do the same analysis for those factors for a realistically pessimistic scenario and tell us the outcome.
It's easy to be critical of someone's work; contributing constructively is more challenging, but a lot more interesting.
 

monopix

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
156
Location
Lincolnshire, UK.
Format
Hybrid
So do the same analysis for those factors for a realistically pessimistic scenario and tell us the outcome.
It's easy to be critical of someone's work; contributing constructively is more challenging, but a lot more interesting.

Sorry, did I rub you up the wrong way or something?

It's not for ME to do any analysis of anything. It's the guy who designed it and is trying to sell it to prove it works.
 

monopix

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
156
Location
Lincolnshire, UK.
Format
Hybrid
I want to compare it against a known good tester - if anyone is able to help out with this I can send them one to play around with. If you have any suggestions on good ways of checking accuracy I'd be keen to hear them

In product development, verification should be a planned exercise. I think you have a way to go yet.
 
OP
OP
bjpirt

bjpirt

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2025
Messages
17
Location
UK
Format
35mm
It's the guy who designed it and is trying to sell it to prove it works

Not trying to sell anything - it's all open source and I have a day job. I was just hoping to engage the community here in creating something useful for everyone to use.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom