LJSLATER
Member
I used A&I in Hollywood for all my E6 film processing from around '07 to last December, when they abandoned E6 (and me). Since December, I've been sending all my E6 film to Dwayne's. There have been a few threads about Dwayne's but I couldn't find any recent ones. Overall, I found their customer service to be absolutely first-rate. They call me to confirm my weird address, they email me when they've shipped my film back to me, and their turn-around is fast! A&I always took forever, usually ignored my instructions, and were indifferent to me when I called or visited with concerns. I patted myself on the back for switching.
But after a couple of months, I kept feeling like there was something "off" with my slides from Dwayne's. Last night I sat down and compared the slides I've gotten recently from Dwayne's to the old ones from A&I (it didn't even occur to me to do this after I switched labs). I obviously can't do a direct A/B comparison, but there is a huge difference; I can tell which lab developed which slides just from looking at them.
I like the A&I slides a lot better, but I don't trust my judgment because I've come to expect a certain look from my film for so long. I don't have a scanner, but I wish everybody could see what I see. I've sent both labs a variety of film including Velvia 50, Fuji T64, and Ektachrome (both G and VS). For each type of film, the A&I slides are consistantly a tad "grittier". The contrast is higher and the colors are more vivid, but the dynamic range is narrower (as well as the exposure latitude). By comparison, the Dwayne's slides feel dull and lifeless, even the Velvia 50. I don't know if either lab's look is "correct", but they are markedly different from one another.
I shouldn't be surprised by my discovery, but I am. I'm not sure what my next step should be; the prospect of developing my own E6 fills me with dread, but I might have to learn.
But after a couple of months, I kept feeling like there was something "off" with my slides from Dwayne's. Last night I sat down and compared the slides I've gotten recently from Dwayne's to the old ones from A&I (it didn't even occur to me to do this after I switched labs). I obviously can't do a direct A/B comparison, but there is a huge difference; I can tell which lab developed which slides just from looking at them.
I like the A&I slides a lot better, but I don't trust my judgment because I've come to expect a certain look from my film for so long. I don't have a scanner, but I wish everybody could see what I see. I've sent both labs a variety of film including Velvia 50, Fuji T64, and Ektachrome (both G and VS). For each type of film, the A&I slides are consistantly a tad "grittier". The contrast is higher and the colors are more vivid, but the dynamic range is narrower (as well as the exposure latitude). By comparison, the Dwayne's slides feel dull and lifeless, even the Velvia 50. I don't know if either lab's look is "correct", but they are markedly different from one another.
I shouldn't be surprised by my discovery, but I am. I'm not sure what my next step should be; the prospect of developing my own E6 fills me with dread, but I might have to learn.