Durst M 600 Opal Screen

sdeeR

D
sdeeR

  • 0
  • 0
  • 12
Rouse St

A
Rouse St

  • 1
  • 0
  • 22
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 2
  • 1
  • 38
Today's Specials.

A
Today's Specials.

  • 3
  • 0
  • 38
Street portrait

A
Street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 33

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,171
Messages
2,787,441
Members
99,831
Latest member
wota69
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
I'm wanting to move from a Dichro to a semi-diffused light source. Because I frequently move my LPL 670 dichro enlarger I'm considering a smaller enlarger without a power supply.

Durst M-600

There are different degrees of diffuseness in illumination systems.

If one uses an opal bulb and the opal screen in the M 600 will the quality of illumination move to a more fully diffused light source vs just using the opal bulb? Or said another way will use of both opal bulb and screen reduce the Callier effect.

The Kaiser 9005 uses both opal screens and condenser but the diffuser is always under the condenser. Kaiser claims this is the best balance and I'm wondering if the M 600 has a similar balance.

More Questions

Has anyone unsatisfied with the Durst M 600 because of dust and neg surface flaws. My experience would indicate glass holders would be a dust problem.

What did you like and dislike about the M 600?

My enlarger end use is to enlarge 645 negatives projected to 6x8 inches or 9x12 inches.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,561
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I believe the "balance" is between lamp wattage and light output. Dichoric diffusion heads are not very efficient, whereas condenser heads are more efficient. Using a hybrid approach has the advantage of both a diffuse source and lower wattage lamp.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
My guess is use of the M 600 opal screen AND 75 watt opal bulb lengthens exposures without addition dust suppression. Upping the bulb wattage results in unwanted heat.

Any M 600 user comments about your enlarger experience would be appreciated. My Google search is turning up comments about uneven illumination and limited baseboard space using a four bladed easel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
I have done more research. The instructions advise to remove the opal screen if using the opal bulb. The intent was to use one or the other.

Base Board Footprint:

The M 600 baseboard is a little larger (15 1/2 x 19 1/2) than a Valoy baseboard. This is a very compact enlarger.

Without a color head/transformer it would be very easy to move and store.
 

snederhiser

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
161
Format
Medium Format
Hello Richard;
Had one of these and used it as a condenser only enlarger. Before putting it into service, a complete cleaning was done. Never had any issues with dust and liked the adjustable film carrier. When putting away take a clean trash bag and tie over the head assembly. Good luck, Steven.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom