• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Double-X 5222

The recommended developer and developing time for 5222 is probably designed to give lower contrast results than you would want for normal prints, since it would typically be printed to a higher contrast print film for projection. Cine neg films are generally lower in contrast than still films.
 
Good point. Thanks for mentioning it.

In any event, I have 400' of it to play with so that's lots of opportunities to try different developers, etc. Given its old-technology roots, I am hoping it develops really nicely in PMK.
 

See: http://www.kodak.com/US/plugins/acrobat/en/motion/products/bw/h15222.pdf

KODAK D-76, KODAK D-96, d-96A and XTOL DEVELOPERS all work well with KODAK 5222 X X 35mm Cine B&W negative Film.
 
I'm testing this now, and am coming in pretty close on it. Just to be sure that I don't make it too easy for anyone, I'm using Germain to develop it. I don't think I've ever seen such extraordinary negatives. If you want to give it a shot, try 10 minutes at 68°F, which is great for overcast conditions, and it is looking like ISO 125 or so is where it is going to shake out.

I've been wanting to try Germain for awhile, because it can be replenished with its own stock solution and lasts, according to Mo himself, virtually forever. I like that! Since I will be working in my truck camper, it makes things easier. The acutance is astonishing; the cleanliness of the shadow areas no less so. Haven't made prints yet, but the highlights appear richly detailed and well defined.
 
D-96 is also a D-76 derivative, although it is pretty far derived. Note that Kodak used to recommend D-76 as the motion picture negative developer. D-96 is:

Water (50C) 750 ml
Metol 2 g
Sodium sulfite (anh) 75 g
Hydroquinone 1.5 g
Postassium bromide 400 mg
or
Sodium bromide 350 mg
Borax (decahydrate) 4.5 g
WTM 1 l
pH at 27C =8.6
Specific gravity at 27C = 1.068
 
There is a really long active thread over on RFF
about shooting and processing 5222 in a variety
of developers --

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52426&highlight=5222

It's worth the effort to browse, if you're thinking of
using 5222 for still photography. Tom Abrahamsson
shoots a lot of it. Tom cautions that motion-picture
film stock is made to less-demanding tolerances
since occasional gelatin specks and other surface
blemishes will not affect a motion picture print.