Don't use Shanghai Film, I guess... Did I mess up my Yashica D?

Jekyll driftwood

H
Jekyll driftwood

  • 0
  • 0
  • 20
It's also a verb.

D
It's also a verb.

  • 2
  • 0
  • 28
The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 11
  • 4
  • 112
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 76

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,915
Messages
2,783,037
Members
99,745
Latest member
Javier Tello
Recent bookmarks
2

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,302
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Even at 120 that is crazy cheap.

Agreed, I haven't seen .EDU Ultra under $5 in a while, and this is under $3.
 
OP
OP

RLangham

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
1,018
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format

Cinema

Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2010
Messages
148
Format
Multi Format
Yes sorry 120. It was on eBay a few
Months ago. I see the same seller now has it at 37. That 5.28 a roll. still not too bad but not great. I can find hp5 close to that price but I thought the Shanghai had a great look from examples I saw
 
Last edited:

Randy Stewart

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
278
Format
Medium Format
Shanghai film has had a few emulsion issues in the past, but if I had to throw a brick at one or the other, my brick lands on the Yashica D. The D (and all other Yashica TLRs for that matter) were fairly crudely designed and built on the inside. When new, they were about as cheap a TLR as you could find. The optics suck by comparison to other Japanese TLR models. After more than 60 yeas, his D is worn out or is totally gummed up from half a century of disuse, as the case may be. Yashica TLRs may look good on the outside, but on the inside, there are just crudely fitted pot metal parts. The problem he describes sounds like the result of having loaded to roll loosely and not snugging it tight before closing the back. This will caused the roll to load loosely in the take up spool, As the film is advanced with photos, it becomes too large in diameter and starts jamming in the take up chamber. I did that once in my Pentax 67. If you keep forcing the roll to advance, you will tear it apart (as here) and end up stripping the gears in the film advance mechanism. I's say to have the D serviced (CLA), but that costs more than its worth.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,372
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Shanghai film has had a few emulsion issues in the past, but if I had to throw a brick at one or the other, my brick lands on the Yashica D. The D (and all other Yashica TLRs for that matter) were fairly crudely designed and built on the inside. When new, they were about as cheap a TLR as you could find. The optics suck by comparison to other Japanese TLR models. After more than 60 yeas, his D is worn out or is totally gummed up from half a century of disuse, as the case may be. Yashica TLRs may look good on the outside, but on the inside, there are just crudely fitted pot metal parts. The problem he describes sounds like the result of having loaded to roll loosely and not snugging it tight before closing the back. This will caused the roll to load loosely in the take up spool, As the film is advanced with photos, it becomes too large in diameter and starts jamming in the take up chamber. I did that once in my Pentax 67. If you keep forcing the roll to advance, you will tear it apart (as here) and end up stripping the gears in the film advance mechanism. I's say to have the D serviced (CLA), but that costs more than its worth.

The problem was not the camera, it was the crappy quality control and basic cheapness of Shanghai. Keep the blame where it belongs.
 
OP
OP

RLangham

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
1,018
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Shanghai film has had a few emulsion issues in the past, but if I had to throw a brick at one or the other, my brick lands on the Yashica D. The D (and all other Yashica TLRs for that matter) were fairly crudely designed and built on the inside. When new, they were about as cheap a TLR as you could find. The optics suck by comparison to other Japanese TLR models. After more than 60 yeas, his D is worn out or is totally gummed up from half a century of disuse, as the case may be. Yashica TLRs may look good on the outside, but on the inside, there are just crudely fitted pot metal parts. The problem he describes sounds like the result of having loaded to roll loosely and not snugging it tight before closing the back. This will caused the roll to load loosely in the take up spool, As the film is advanced with photos, it becomes too large in diameter and starts jamming in the take up chamber. I did that once in my Pentax 67. If you keep forcing the roll to advance, you will tear it apart (as here) and end up stripping the gears in the film advance mechanism. I's say to have the D serviced (CLA), but that costs more than its worth.

Seems like few people share your opinion of Yashicas, at least to the extremes you take it.

I especially like your admission that the same thing can happen in your Pentax, which I will admit is a nicer camera.

At any rate, I'm hopeful that it might not have stripped: the advance knob was still turning a similar number of times for each frame and then locking, which tells me that the mechanism is still doing something.

What would have been helpful out of all the information you posted here would be saying "oh yeah, be sure the film is good and snug or it can bunch up at a certain point from getting too big in the takeup chamber."

What's not helpful is just talking trash about my camera, probably unearned at that, mentioning offhand what the problem might be while referring to me in the third person, then jumping right back into to telling me what trash my camera is which... I still don't think is factually accurate.
 

grat

Member
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
2,044
Location
Gainesville, FL
Format
Multi Format
I have a Yashica 12, and it's a very nice little camera that takes rather nice photographs. Granted, I did have Mark Hama do a full service on it last year, but I haven't experienced any of the issues described by Randy Stewart. While it has a very different character to my Mamiya C33, that's not necessarily a bad thing.
 
OP
OP

RLangham

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
1,018
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I have a Yashica 12, and it's a very nice little camera that takes rather nice photographs. Granted, I did have Mark Hama do a full service on it last year, but I haven't experienced any of the issues described by Randy Stewart. While it has a very different character to my Mamiya C33, that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Well, what is similar to a Mamiya C series? I suppose you could compare it to some modular medium format press cameras of the time, but that loses some of the character. I think it was the only bellows-based modular TLR in medium format that didn't fail in the market immediately.

I've had a lens pair and shutter for Mamiya C pass through my hands. A guy I've bought from on many occasions didn't know what it was. Gave it to me with a Pentax SPII and a little plastic Argus rangefinder camera for 30 bucks. Made money on it but as I recall a fellow kept making me low-ball offers and I needed gas money... Should probably sell that SPII at some point but I haven't tested the meter.
 

grat

Member
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
2,044
Location
Gainesville, FL
Format
Multi Format
Well, what is similar to a Mamiya C series? I suppose you could compare it to some modular medium format press cameras of the time, but that loses some of the character. I think it was the only bellows-based modular TLR in medium format that didn't fail in the market immediately.

Part of the complaint expressed about Yashicas was that "the optics suck by comparison to other Japanese TLR models"-- The Yashinon f/3.5 lens in my Yashica 12 may not be quite as sharp as the Sekor 80mm f/2.8 in my C33, but that doesn't mean it "sucks".
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,302
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
The Yashinon f/3.5 lens in my Yashica 12 may not be quite as sharp as the Sekor 80mm f/2.8 in my C33, but that doesn't mean it "sucks".

The Yashinon and Yashikor were very respectable triplet and Tessar type lenses. If someone has experience to make them think those lenses "suck" they may have had a bad one, or one mis-assembled by a servicer ("professional" or amateur) after, say, a cleaning. By the time the Yashica TLRs were out, even an f/2.8 Tessar type lens could be pretty good (and I don't recall Yashica TLRs with faster than f/3.5).
 
OP
OP

RLangham

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
1,018
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Part of the complaint expressed about Yashicas was that "the optics suck by comparison to other Japanese TLR models"-- The Yashinon f/3.5 lens in my Yashica 12 may not be quite as sharp as the Sekor 80mm f/2.8 in my C33, but that doesn't mean it "sucks".

The Yashinon and Yashikor were very respectable triplet and Tessar type lenses. If someone has experience to make them think those lenses "suck" they may have had a bad one, or one mis-assembled by a servicer ("professional" or amateur) after, say, a cleaning. By the time the Yashica TLRs were out, even an f/2.8 Tessar type lens could be pretty good (and I don't recall Yashica TLRs with faster than f/3.5).
People who talk trash about Tessar designs are very silly. There are qualities where Tessars are lacking but not everything is mural-level sharpness and perfect color correction. Tessars more often than not have good character even if they don't compare to more modern lenses in any single metric.

I've shot Soviet Industars and Argus Cintars that had appealing qualities at middle apertures and far-to-middle distance, and both are of inferior quality to most German and Japanese Tessar types.

I don't ever know what to think of people who obsess too much over the extremely fine technical characteristics of lenses. It calls their skills into question.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,372
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
People who talk trash about Tessar designs are very silly. There are qualities where Tessars are lacking but not everything is mural-level sharpness and perfect color correction. Tessars more often than not have good character even if they don't compare to more modern lenses in any single metric.

I've shot Soviet Industars and Argus Cintars that had appealing qualities at middle apertures and far-to-middle distance, and both are of inferior quality to most German and Japanese Tessar types.

I don't ever know what to think of people who obsess too much over the extremely fine technical characteristics of lenses. It calls their skills into question.

Some people have to go around kicking whom ever they think is the lessor. This also apply to photographic equipment.
 

Hayek

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2022
Messages
14
Location
New York City
Format
Multi Format
I've just had a strange experience with some bottom-shelf Chinese 120 BW film, Shanghai Pan 100 or 200 (don't remember). I loaded it into my Yashica D about a year and a half ago. I think it may have been the very first roll I loaded into it, as I've basically never used the D. Vaguely I remember at some point before the seventh frame the winding knob got incredibly stiff to the point that it hurt to turn even gripping it through my shirt.

I promptly forgot all about it and shot mainly 35mm since then.

Pulled it out today, clipped on my new Kodalux L meter (I especially like the incident light metering) and went out to shoot. After frame seven, I pressed the release button and found once again that it was incredibly difficult to turn, and began to remember something about it being that way before.

I finished the roll, having a bunch of fun doing incident metering for the first time in forever, but struggling with the winder. I found it especially hard to turn the knob the last few turns to wrap the film up in the backing paper.

When I got inside I opened the camera and found a mess. The film had torn loose from the backing paper, stayed wrapped the first spool, and was rubbing against the backing paper and creasing up into the gap between the gate and the takeup spool, apparently pinched.

So first of all, don't fall to the temptation of using this bargain film. If I remember right my Medalist may not have liked it either.

Second, do you think this could have damaged the frame-spacing mechanism of the Yashica? There's no visible damage to the gripping wheel or anything else on the inside, but I know first hand how temperamental 120 film transport mechanisms can be.

The miracle of PRC 'quality' production. Aside from contraband fentanyl sold to cartels, stuff just looks like real things serious people make.
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
The lens in my 124g was excellent. Even Harry Fleenor of Rolleiflex service fame mentions this.
Shame my film transport failed - overlapping images etc. But I have no idea what happened to the camera before I got it.
 
OP
OP

RLangham

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
1,018
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
As an addendum, someone recommended to me in a PM that I put a bare spool in the takeup side and test the film transport through a whole 12 frames. It latched appropriately at regular intervals of about two point one six (give or take) turns. So I'm going to try another roll of better film and assume it's fine.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom