It is too long ago for me to remember precisely, though two things do come to mind:
1. The motor drive can be warm to touch over extended shooting (normal); and
2. The motor drive/wind and rewind should be silent. This feature (particularly the coreless motor assay) was passed down into the subsequent EOS body range.
My T90 (1987-1989) was well loved and used during uni study, plus weekend bushwalks and skitouring (stored in the tent, it never failed to fire up in below zero temperatures). The two points above regarding quietness made a big impact compared to the industrial clunk-whirr of e.g. the Nikon F3/F3HP owned previously!
As the motor drive is integral to the body, service where indicated is more involved. If it doesn't sound right, I would seriously angle for a bench test with Canon to ascertain if anything needs adjustment. The T90, like the EOS bodies that followed it (particularly the EOS1/1N), wouldn't necessarily show any glaringly visible signs of having been dropped/banged, if such an event has even remotely put things out of kilter.
All cameras benefit from being used frequently, fellas!!