He should join the forum, he'd fit right in.
Surely he’s wrong? There is lots of bloody war photography, and photos of disasters, deprived areas, refugees, homelessness, poverty. Just not on heavily souped Tri-X.
Surely he’s wrong? There is lots of bloody war photography, and photos of disasters, deprived areas, refugees, homelessness, poverty. Just not on heavily souped Tri-X.
But he's right in the sense that, in order to sell that stuff, you have to outcompete a hundred people with iPhones who also happened to be in the same place at the same time and will provide their images for free
My studio / darkroom is in Finsbury Park, and while it’s not quite as gentrified as other nearby areas, is certainly a different place to where Don grew up. I walk down the street he lived most mornings and always cite it when sending directions from the tube stations to new clients coming to visit. While he mostly prints his own work, I did a bit of work for him a few years back. It was for an exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery in London of the heads of different faiths in the UK. Not the exhibition prints, which he did, but the smaller 12x16s to give to all the subjects. Heads of the Anglican and Catholic church, the leading Iman and Rabbi etc.
NPG link
When Don heard where I was based, he wanted to have the meeting to brief me at my work, near his old home, but sadly he didn’t have time so we met at the NPG with the curator. He’s a man with quite a dry and mournful sense of humour, as others who have worked with him will probably agree. After handing me the negatives he said something along the lines of ‘I hope these are not too much of a burden to print and if your prints are better than mine, well I will hate you forever!’ I think his tongue may have been in his cheek but can’t say for sure!
I went to the private view of the exhibition and nine of the ten subjects were there. While I don’t profess to having any religious beliefs myself, (though absolutely respect those that do), I have to admit there was a definite atmosphere and energy in the room. It was heartening to see how all these important people, with very different religious background, seemed to be getting on fine, chatting away to each other. I hope they enjoyed the refreshments as much as I did!
But he's right in the sense that, in order to sell that stuff, you have to outcompete a hundred people with iPhones who also happened to be in the same place at the same time and will provide their images for free
I've always thought that the title of this is incomplete.
It really should be: "Nobody wants to pay for the pictures I used to take."
No. I think if you pay attention to other things McCullin has said, he mean no one wants photos like the ones he used to take. His photos were up close, immersive, completely focused on the actual violence of the situation. He didn't stand a mile away with a 500mm lens.
No. I think if you pay attention to other things McCullin has said, he mean no one wants photos like the ones he used to take. His photos were up close, immersive, completely focused on the actual violence of the situation. He didn't stand a mile away with a 500mm lens.
A lot of the photos published that you see of the war in Ukraine look like a movie set. Photos from after - it's safe. Here's a clump from the immediate search results for "bombed ukraine"
View attachment 349353
I don't mean there is no value in contemporary photography of these things. I think the type of photojournalism Don McCullin did and was permitted to do - the access he had - is just no longer permitted.
no one wants to pay someone who makes them
There is another style
I never imagined there wasn't.
Well your exaggerations about the 500 mm lens say the opposite.
Uh, well, I did only say that was what McCullin did not do. Did I say everyone else did it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?