I consider this to be either marketing hype or Yet Another Internet Myth. I spent my money and time (back in 2014) to find out, following an expert recommendation on this platform. Tests with Fomabrom Variant 111. Dektol 1+2 versus Dokumol 1+6. The only difference was that development was faster in dokumol, at the stated dilution (but, to completion in both cases).Dokumol was a contrast enhancing developer which manages to increase the contrast of the paper by up to one grade. This was pretty unique
@bernard_L maybe because Dektol is a high-contrast developer to begin with?
I remember substituting Dokumol with RHC years ago
Paper is generally developed to completion. As a result, differences between developers will be limited to fairly subtle alterations of toe & shoulder and image tone/hue.@bernard_L maybe because Dektol is a high-contrast developer to begin with?
I had not thought of THAT one.
Dokumol was a contrast enhancing developer which manages to increase the contrast of the paper by up to one grade. This was pretty unique and will not be possible with the alternatives mentioned. Eukobrom was a standard blue-black working developer which is quite well matched with Neutol NE from our range. MCC developer is a superior developer yielding a better DMax. We are still wondering if we should bring back Dokumol. What are your thoughts?
I had the same experience with Ilford MG developer. There was a marked difference when I switched to Dokumol.What I don't like about it is the marginally greenish tone in Ilford's own Multigrade developer - hence I tone it slightly in selenium. Like the OP, I'd love to avoid that step.
For film or paper?
I took RHC for paper only.
I entered your 'poll' asking for Dokumol and Centrabrom ;-)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?