And he thought that any GWC can just machine gun it and something will come out.
"Whaddaya mean I gotta aim and focus!"
This is what happens when one goes with the lowest bidder.
ROTFLMAO!
Steve
Apparently they paid £1,500. There are a lot of scammers out there!
Speaking of making it easier for hacks...
http://gizmodo.com/5374890/this-is-a-photoshop-and-it-blew-my-mind
For that kind of money I might just whore myself out as a wedding photographer!
Steve
They didn't go with the lowest bidder. They paid £1450. They didn't ask cousin Henry with his new DSLR, they chose a firm called 'Fresh Images', advertising as specialists in Wedding and Portrait photography. They got ripped off by shoddy workmanship.This is what happens when one goes with the lowest bidder.
Why would you say that?
I'm not a wedding photographer, but I certainly don't think that photographing a wedding competently is "whoring". Even doing it incompetently isn't whoring so much as it is lazy and deceitful.
You can make a credible argument that wedding photography is more craft than art, though some may disagree even with that.
The photographer's website is currently showing as out of service. If it's up for sale, cousin Henry could have a go at going legit. He couldn't possibly be worse!Cousin Henry might have done much better.
Can't help, but the whole story is funny as hell. So are the pictures
Cousin Henry might have done much better.
Can't help, but the whole story is funny as hell. So are the pictures
The photographer's website is currently showing as out of service. If it's up for sale, cousin Henry could have a go at going legit. He couldn't possibly be worse!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6283530/Wedding-photographer-defends-his-pictures.html
The company is apparently now out of business. The article also quotes him:
"I believe I am a great photographer, technically and creatively"
Yeah right
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6283530/Wedding-photographer-defends-his-pictures.html
The company is apparently now out of business. The article also quotes him:
"I believe I am a great photographer, technically and creatively"
Yeah right
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6283530/Wedding-photographer-defends-his-pictures.html
The company is apparently now out of business. The article also quotes him:
"I believe I am a great photographer, technically and creatively"
Yeah right
Heck, I thought you were talking to actual "danger". I once had a lady threaten to have me killed if I gave the prints to the person who paid for the job. She then said, "Of course, I'll pay your regular fee plus a premium." When I told her my loyalty must remain with my original client she became enraged and demanded her husband to take me outside and deal with me. Fotunately, the other wedding party had several members of the local police department. They put an end to that nonesense. I did look over my shoulder from time-to-time for awhile though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?