I have been noticing a "strange" thing one year ago, when I switched to 120. My negatives have become so clear, with an almost transparent base! Instead, in 35mm, I always got a grey base and a rather low contrast image, under the same development condition. I was happy with that so I didn't really care and moved on, but I still have to answer that question; so I started testing again.
At first I thought I might have some light leak into the 135 cartridge, but I have tried loading and unloading film in complete darkness and I still experience this, so I ruled out this cause.
Ilford documents that FP4+ in 135 has a slightly thicker base than the 120: maybe this is the cause for increased base density?
If nobody else has experienced this difference, I must conclude that it depends on a metering system defect or inaccuracy: I manually meter and set my 120 camera accordingly, while I let the auto exposure on the 135 camera do the job on spot mode. (but that is not going to explain the base density, also present in the unexposed frames, is it?).
The film is not expired and has not been through x-rays or the like.
Last thing it comes to my mind is that it might be an issue with agitation, due to the presence of sprocket holes which are absent in 120.
Any input is appreciated.
Have a nice day!
[edit: maybe a lens issue? In the 135 camera I have cheap lens, could be that it somehow `diffuses` the light on the film.. who knows!]