Does Ferricyanide bleach exhaust? If so when?

mohmad khatab

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
1,228
Location
Egypt
Format
35mm
Yes, yes, dear brother ,, I know that you speak with humor.
- But the difference is great, dear brother. The difference is large between the quantities produced by a professional laboratory and between the quantities produced by a home user.
Basically, there is no comparison.
So I see our friend OP has consumed his valuable time reading, researching, reviewing, checking, and ultimately the value of those chemical raw materials is worth nothing.
- I am a really poor man, and it suffices to tell you that I am Egyptian, and this implies that I am poor and not ashamed of that.
But sometimes time is more precious than the cost of these materials, and sometimes the presence of this chemistry in the home becomes a burden and takes place.
So I am speaking out of public interest ,,
I am not a rich man and sometimes I mix two chemicals in order to give the same effect as another little expensive substance ,, and all of this in order to save money ,,,
But in that case ,, I try to renew the chemistry only once and if I have doubts about its effectiveness, I immediately get rid of it without regret. And in this case as someone who gets rid of his food waste after digesting it and it is not suitable for eating
God bless you brother
 
OP
OP

GBS

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
115
Location
Memphis, TN
Format
Multi Format
if I have doubts about its effectiveness, I immediately get rid of it without regret. And in this case as someone who gets rid of his food waste after digesting it and it is not suitable for eating
God bless you brother
HA! This is a good one about food waste! I simply don't like to waste. I like spending an hour or two researching and discussing reuse, even if doesn't save me a dime. It's a blessing and a curse.

I was in Egypt twice for a very short time, once as a young boy, then again as a young man. It's beautiful and the people were very kind. I took some of my favorite photographs there.
 
OP
OP

GBS

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
115
Location
Memphis, TN
Format
Multi Format
Table 7.2 says that SR-29 bleach replenishment rate is 200ml of replenisher per 100 feet of 35mm film which translates into 11g of Ferricyanide and 7g of Bromide.
Hey @Raghu Kuvempunagar--thanks again for the clear direction where to find this info. It's been a big help and I'm still embarrassed I missed it so easily.

One tangential question to see if I'm reading that chart correctly. Can I assume the developer can process 100'/L without replenishment? Or does the developer need replenishment after each roll? (~45ml for each 36exp processed)



Ultimately, I'll be working with 1L and I'm curious about a potential time increase compensation which I haven't found commonly published for ECN-2.

Thanks a lot
 
Last edited:

Mr Bill

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
1,486
Format
Multi Format
One tangential question to see if I'm reading that chart correctly. Can I assume the developer can process 100'/L without replenishment?

Hi, I'm obviously not Raghu, but can probably give a reasonable answer. It's "no."

If you actually tried to process 100 ft of film, by hand, using 1 liter of developer, you would probably finish up with only about half your developer left. And it would be suffering pretty badly from "exhaustion."

To put some of the things in the H-24 manual in perspective, it's written in support of professional use of the products, where one wants to have a consistent product always coming off the machine. And you only get this with more or less constant replenishment. Now, the size of the developer tank has a lot to do with things, where a large tank size gives you a substantial buffer. But with only one liter of developer, you would ideally be replenishing every roll or two.

Ultimately, I'll be working with 1L and I'm curious about a potential time increase compensation which I haven't found commonly published for ECN-2.

These cine-type processors don't even have the capability of compensating with development time. If you were to ask one of the operators of such a machine about such a thing they would probably just ask, "why would you want to do that?" If you said it was to compensate for lack of replenishment, they'd ask, "why don't you just turn up the replenishment rate?" It's a completely different world from what most people here are familiar with.
 
OP
OP

GBS

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
115
Location
Memphis, TN
Format
Multi Format
It's a completely different world from what most people here are familiar with.
Thank you--I totally get that. To be clear, processing and printing B&W stills in my bedroom closet as a young man ultimately led to a career in the film industry; I have several thousand feet of raw 16mm in the fridge now. I am learning a lot about development chemicals, time, replenishment, all the way down to separate rollers and tanks in the machines that I never had to pay paid attention to. The fundamentals of exposing and processing B&W, C-41, and ECN-2 are all something I have experience with, at least by proxy once-removed. I've never processed color it myself, but I know more than enough to be a thorn in someone's side when I'm ready to learn. I appreciate your, end everyone's patience and input.
If you actually tried to process 100 ft of film, by hand, using 1 liter of developer, you would probably finish up with only about half your developer left. And it would be suffering pretty badly from "exhaustion."
But with only one liter of developer, you would ideally be replenishing every roll or two.
Thanks a ton! These are both simple and clear. Common sense led me to believe replinishment would have to be done incrementally. That makes sense. Now, don't be mad at me if I experiment with extended time in place of replenishment. I realize motion film processors have a massive volume buffer and are not built to time-compensate. I think experimenting with the documented compensation times for C-41 is a great place to start. If it's remotely informative, I look forward to sharing my findings with the community.

I didn't mean to hijack my own thread. I asked the question about developer, using the previously mentioned chart to make sure I was understanding it. Thanks again!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,800
Location
India
Format
Multi Format
Now, don't be mad at me if I experiment with extended time in place of replenishment.

Just curious to know. Are you going to be processing one or two rolls (36 exposures) at a time or entire 100 feet in one shot? If it is the former then you may want to check this post by @fdonadio which says 1 litre of developer has a capacity of about 12 rolls without replenishment.
 
Last edited:

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm


Why get rid of it if it’s still active?

Or to make a parallel with your example about life: why suicide if you’re alive?
 
OP
OP

GBS

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
115
Location
Memphis, TN
Format
Multi Format
@Raghu Kuvempunagar thank you for the question and clarification--super helpful and important. Indeed, I will be doing one or two rolls. I'm aware of the 12/L target with home kits. I was curious about replenishment rate in general--which you and others helped clear up, thank you! Replinishing doesn't seem to make a ton of sense for me right now simply because shelf-life of the replinisher--it'll go bad as fast as the developer and I'm not shooting that kind of volume. Maybe I'll have time someday if I stop asking so many questions-ha!

All that said, at some point I'll test mixing micro amounts of replinisher (say, 10-20%) and replace 90ml of developer every 2 rolls. (That would mean my scale needs to be accurate to 0.01, especially for the Sodium Bromide and Sodium Bicarbonate, so I'll cross that bridge later, but micro replenishing is something I'm at least interested in one day down the line).

Once I'm happy with the basics of ECN-2 and have a consistent workflow, I'll probably do some time compensation tests.

But again, I think I'm racing the clock in general with 1L. However, if I can mix 250mL of dev and micro-replenish, that might work. Again, all this needs to be checked and tested. I'm working on my starting point now. Thanks a ton!
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Thank you for this digression into terminology.

More so as terms may be used even differently. So a german manufacturer called a replenisher "Regenerator".
 
OP
OP

GBS

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
115
Location
Memphis, TN
Format
Multi Format
Hi all!

Placed an order for ECN-2 and C-41 chemicals yesterday. Getting close! Again, I'll be working with a friend to do a series of side-by-side stocks and development tests, mostly with Vision films. I used an ECN-2 kit for some basic development tests and am very happy with the result so far.

I'm coming back to this thread to see if anyone has further guidance/experience with hard numbers when using this type bleach--even with C-41?

Considering my workflow ... developer > water wash > stop > water wash > bleach ... I would assume the bleach will remain fairly free of developer contamination.

Using the Kodak ECN-2 publication, and assuming the replenishers all have a somewhat-relative potency, it appears as though this bleach will last about 4x as long as the developer. (I will not be replinishing, but I am using the rates as a comparison.)

Many say ECN-2 does about 12 35mm/36 rolls per L. Is it safe to assume this bleach will do 4x that with water/stop/water in between developer and bleach? (or even 3x to be safe. I'd like to minimize my waste and environmental impact.)

Thanks so much!
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
23,651
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
I never measured the capacity of the ferricyanide bleach, but it seems to go a long way. I think I got close to the 36 rolls/liter figure before I stepped away from ecn2.
Btw, I'd suggest leaving out the water wash after the developer. It doesn't have a function and if anything, it's counterproductive. Stop right after developer, and I'd then do 2 consecutive water washes to get most of the developer and stop out of the emulsion before the ferricyanide bleach. You don't want significant quantities of sulfuric acid (ecn2 stop) to carry over into the bleach.
 
OP
OP

GBS

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
115
Location
Memphis, TN
Format
Multi Format
@koraks Thanks a ton—as always. And noted on the water wash after the developer. 36/36 is plenty. Thanks a lot
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…