Does camera body affect image quality?

Marco S.

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2005
Messages
103
Location
Massachusett
Format
Multi Format
I use a Canon EOS Elan 7E and a couple L series lenses. Lenses being the most important part of any camera system alongside the photographer, how important is the body exactly???

I have been eyeing a 1N, but I really enjoy the 7E, and was wondering if its worth upgrading if image quality isn't highly affected by the body, or is it? (I manually meter and focus most of the time, and I don't use flash that often).

I guess my question is will image quality improve with a better, professional quality body or is it just a question of durability and bells & whistles?

-Marco
 

ron110n

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
130
Location
Los Angeles
Format
35mm RF
The metering quality and the mirror slap for SLR is all I can think of. Rangefinder Cameras don't have a mirror and can capture 1/30th of a second hand held in available light for an average person. But it's not a WYSIWYG in SLR frame because of the parallax and no macro.
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
The main image difference that a body can make is film flatness, and past the threshold of cheap, you are splitting hairs. It mostly boils down to your preference for the reliability, ergonomics, lenses that a body mounts, or some combination of the characteristics of a system, be it SLR, rangefinder, or whatever.
 

ron110n

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
130
Location
Los Angeles
Format
35mm RF
WYSIWYG = What you see is what you get.
Rangefinder, you may loose the bottom of the image frame and get more from the top if your lens is wide open. You need to compensate.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,970
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
Not as much as the camera manufacturers would have you believe IMHO, although the reliability , and shutter accuracy tend to be better on high end cameras in general, with your Canon L lenses I don't think you will see any difference at all in the quality of your images from your Elan 7E.
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
On the one hand: if you enjoy a body, why go for another, unless it has specific features that you need/want?

On the other hand: try new things! Who knows, you may find that the body affects you more than you thought it might.

Regarding 35mm bodies, I shot with an F5 for some time and, yeah, it made me feel like a man. Big "pro" body etc. Then I picked up and F100 and that was it, the F5 was packed off to KEH the next day. Totally different tool and it's just what I needed at the time: a fresh start. At the moment, though, I am favouring an OM1 to my F100 for some reason. Go figure. Sometimes less is more. Sometimes not.
 

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,146
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
There are alot of things that can go wrong with a camera which most certainly affect image quality.
Metering and Autofocus are the main issues.
Mirror slap can affect slow shutter speeds, but then so can hands, winds, moving subjects, earthquakes, farts, etc.
Most of these are really rare to see in a modern 35mm:
Incorrect registration of the film plane, focusing screen, or lens mount.
Bad frame spacing, light leaks, shutter malfunctions (slow lead or secondary shutter blind).
film not held flat, rangefinder out of alignment.

Dont even get me started on what could go wrong in a large format.. that could take me all day!
Ref: wheres that link to 60 easy steps to large format photography??
 
OP
OP

Marco S.

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2005
Messages
103
Location
Massachusett
Format
Multi Format
Yeah, I'm really contemplating picking up a nice 1N in EX+ condition from KEH. I like the feel of a solid camera in my hands, makes me feel good.
 

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
The reason to move to a 1N would be how fast and durable the camera is, not image quality. As long as a body holds the film flat and mounts the lens the proper distance from the film (and has a properly working shutter, of course), image quality will be identical. I would trust all Canon and other name-brand cameras to do this.

What might be different between bodies is the quality of your shooting, due to certain features either helping you or distracting you. For instance, I find that in general I prefer my 1976 F-1 over my 1972 F-1 because of the shorter advance stroke and different shape of the advance lever, the fact that the meter can be set up to EI 3200, and because the battery check switch is momentary, so it cannot be accidentally left on. I prefer the '72 over the '76 when using flash, because the PC synch. is finicky on the '76. Each has different quirks, so each will distract you with slightly different considerations and possibly cause you to shoot a little differently in certain scenarios. Due to features, I prefer both of these cameras to my FTb, however, technical image quality is identical.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,873
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
A camera body is like any other tool - if it is well designed and suited to you and your needs, it can add to the quality of the photographs.

To my mind, the two features of a camera body that are most likely to impact the quality of the image are:

1) the viewing system - is the image bright, contrasty and easy to focus, and does it accurately indicate what is actually on the resulting negative or slide?; and
2) are the ergonomics of the camera (which of course includes the lens) such that you can easily hold the camera still, and operate all the necessary functions, without causing camera shake, or incorrect focus or exposure, or awkward winding?

Matt
 

Poisson Du Jour

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
5,462
Location
.
Format
Digital
The 1N is a beautiful machine to work with. I changed up from an EOS 5 after using a 5 for 11 years. The 1N is quite a revelation, particularly its precision of metering, but what I really like about it is the power drive booster E1 taking 8 lithium batteries (being very lighteight and unaffected by cold), which have been in use now for 5 years (!). At grassroots level, though, the camera body is a secondary consideration and your first point of attention should be lenses. All the camera body does is hold/wind/rewind and expose the film for you. Once you're happy with the lens(es) you're using (and Canon's 'L' series are wonderful, when used and understood correctly) you can pay attention to the body. My thoughts are that years of experience working with each camera system will eventually make you see just which one you really like and can settle with over a long period of time. I've used all the systems and settled on Canon as far back as the T90 in 1988, before briefly going to Minolta and Nikon and finally back to Canon. Personally, I don't want anything more from a camera body than what the EOS 1N offers me. Anything more just complicates and bogs down my contemplative approach to photography.
 

Colin Corneau

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
2,366
Location
Winnipeg MB Canada
Format
35mm RF
I find "pro" bodies are more durable and last longer before breaking down.

All things being equal -- two normally functioning cameras -- you'd be hardpressed to see a difference. The difference, IMHO, comes a year or two or ten down the line (depending on how much wear you put the camera through).

Quality wise re: your images, as JBrunner says, there's no appreciable difference beyond the "el cheapo" line.
 

nemo999

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
277
Format
35mm
I once had a mint-looking Pentax Spotmatic and a set of mint lenses. I never got a single sharp picture because of the fact that the camera's vibration level had risen with age (even though operating noise was normal and there were no visibly damaged components). The same lenses used on a Leica with an adapter gave beautifully sharp results.
 

Steve Roberts

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
1,299
Location
Near Tavisto
Format
35mm
keithwms said:
On the one hand: if you enjoy a body, why go for another, unless it has specific features that you need/want?

On the other hand: try new things! Who knows, you may find that the body affects you more than you thought it might.
Click to expand...

I'm sure I heard that same advice offred on a "Dr Ruth" programme...

Steve
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
Weight may be an issue. If it is too light you may move it too much if hand held. A heavier camera needs more inertia to get it moving so you should be able to hold it steadier.


Steve.
 

df cardwell

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
3,357
Location
Dearborn,Mic
Format
Multi Format
Not all camera bodies focus accurately.

Few maintain their mechanical accuracy over time (as they wear).

Not all have precise film to lens registration.

Few have really precise film flatness.

With a motor drive, the speed of film transport reduced film flatness,
and reduces sharpness.

You don't HAVE to buy the top-of-the-line cameras,
but you DO have to buy cameras with the right to return
if your example is a loser.
 

Samuel Hotton

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
383
Format
Medium Format
I seem to recall that ALPA manufactured a 35mm camera that pin registered the film. It had a reseau plate and a moving pressure plate. Talk about film registration and flatness.
Sam H.
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,276
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
Samuel Hotton said:
I seem to recall that ALPA manufactured a 35mm camera that pin registered the film. It had a reseau plate and a moving pressure plate. Talk about film registration and flatness.
Sam H.
Click to expand...

& Contax offered a vacuum back in one of theirs(ST?)
 

clayne

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
2,764
Location
San Francisc
Format
Multi Format
Marco S. said:
Yeah, I'm really contemplating picking up a nice 1N in EX+ condition from KEH. I like the feel of a solid camera in my hands, makes me feel good.
Click to expand...

This effect wears off after all your subjects consistently avoid the camera.
 

Joe Grodis

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
201
Location
Wyoming, PA
Format
Medium Format
I've found the that in extreme conditions like very cold weather the cheaper cameras shutters tend to SLOW down. So, IMHO the camera body does make a difference some of the time.


-Joe
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…